Garbett v. Anderson et al
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/10/20 ORDERING plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should be revoked. The clerk of the court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Pro Se Unit at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (cc: Pro Se Unit, USCA-9th circuit) (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KARRICK M. GARBETT,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
No. 2:18-CV-1793-KJM-DMC-P
ORDER
JENNIFER SCHAFFER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals the
17
18
court's final judgment entered on September 30, 2019. The matter was referred to the
19
undersigned by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to certify whether in forma pauperis status
20
should continue on appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith, in which case
21
in forma pauperis status would be revoked. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v.
22
American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). Having reviewed the entire file, the
23
court concludes in forma pauperis status should be revoked because the appeal is frivolous.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should be revoked; and
3
2.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Pro
4
Se Unit at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
5
6
7
Dated: January 10, 2020
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?