Oliver v. Shelton et al

Filing 88

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/9/2022 DENYING 87 Motion for Extension of Time without prejudice. (Perdue, C.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DARON MICHAEL OLIVER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:18-CV-1809-KJM-DMC

v.

ORDER

MEL,
Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the

18

Court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 87, for an extension of time to serve initial disclosures.

19

Plaintiff’s motion is denied without prejudice because he does not state any reasons for granting

20

an extension, nor does Plaintiff indicate the amount of additional time needed. Plaintiff may re-

21

file his motion accompanied by a declaration showing cause for an extension of time.

22

Alternatively, Plaintiff may seek a brief continuance of the deadline by reaching a stipulation with

23

the Defendant’s counsel.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 9, 2022

____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1