Washoe Paiute Tribe, et al v. HUD et al
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/8/2018 DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. ORDERING that plaintiff is GRANTING 14 days in which to submit the appropriate fees to the Clerk of the Court. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to pay the filing and general administrative fees in the amount of $400 will result in a recommendation that the instant action be dismissed without prejudice. (Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICK McCANN, et al.,
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. 2:18-cv-01820 MCE CKD (PS)
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, et al.,
Defendants.
Plaintiff Rick McCann, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on June 25, 2018.
18
(ECF No. 1.) While there are several other named plaintiffs, including the Washoe Paiute Tribe
19
of Antelope Valley, only McCann signed the complaint. (ECF No. 1 at 5.)
20
Plaintiff McCann (“Plaintiff”) has filed an in forma pauperis affidavit in which he states
21
that his monthly take home pay is $1,600. (ECF No. 2.) In response to a question on the form
22
seeking the names of “all persons who are dependent on me for support, my relationship with
23
each person, and how much I contribute to their support,” plaintiff has listed five individuals
24
identified as co-plaintiffs in the complaint and “Washoe Pauite of Antelope Valley,” with no
25
additional information. (Id. at 2.)
26
Pursuant to federal statute, a filing fee of $350.00 is required to commence a civil action
27
in federal district court. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). In addition, a $50.00 general administrative fee for
28
civil cases must be paid. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(b). The court may authorize the commencement of an
1
1
action “without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor,” by a person who makes
2
affidavit that he is unable to pay such costs or give security therefor. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Only
3
a natural person, not an organization, may proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to § 1915(a).
4
California Men’s Colony v. Rowland, 939 F.2d 854, 858 (9th Cir. 1991). Moreover, corporations
5
and other unincorporated associations must appear in court through an attorney. In re America
6
West Airlines, 40 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 1994).
7
Here, plaintiff McCann seeks to appear in forma pauperis on behalf of the Washoe Paiute
8
Tribe of Antelope Valley. It is not clear whether he also seeks to represent multiple named
9
plaintiffs who have not signed the complaint and for whom no contact information has been
10
provided. See Johns v. County of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 876 (9th Cir. 1997) (“While a non-
11
attorney may appear pro se on his own behalf, he has no authority to appear as an attorney for
12
others than himself.”) (internal quotations and citation omitted). In addition, the in forma
13
pauperis application is incomplete, as it does not indicate plaintiff’s relationship to the individuals
14
who purportedly rely on him for support or how much he contributes to their support. For these
15
reasons, plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied.
16
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is granted fourteen days in which
17
to submit the appropriate fees to the Clerk of the Court. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to pay
18
the filing and general administrative fees in the amount of $400 will result in a recommendation
19
that the instant action be dismissed without prejudice.
20
Dated: August 8, 2018
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
2/ mccann1820.ifp.den
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?