Singanonh v. Fine et al

Filing 44

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/15/20 ORDERING that within 21 days of the filing of this order, defendants shall file an answer to the first amended complaint.(Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIENGKHAM SINGANONH, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:18-cv-1824 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. FINE, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action filed 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case was originally referred to the court’s Post-Screening 19 ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Project, ECF No. 21, and after the parties were unable to 20 settle the case, ECF No. 31, defendants were ordered to file a response to the first amended 21 complaint, ECF No. 32. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, ECF No. 33, which has now been 22 denied, ECF No. 43. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the filing of this 24 order, defendants shall file an answer to the first amended complaint. 25 DATED: December 15, 2020 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?