(PC) Faultry v. Saechao et al
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/9/2020 SETTING Settlement Conference for 11/12/2020 at 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota and ORDERING Parties to submit confidential settlement statements no later than 11/5/2020. (cc: DMC) (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHARLES FAULTRY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:18-cv-1850 KJM AC P
v.
ORDER and
J. SAECHAO, et al.,
15
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. §1983.
18
The court has determined that this case will benefit from a settlement conference. Therefore, this
19
case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota to conduct a settlement conference on
20
November 12, 2020 at 1:00 p.m. The settlement conference will be conducted by remote means,
21
to be determined at a later date and time. The Court will issue the necessary transportation order
22
in due course.
23
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Dennis M.
25
Cota on November 12, 2020 at 1:00 p.m. The settlement conference will be
26
conducted by remote means, to be determined at a later date and time.
27
////
28
////
1
1
2
2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding
settlement on the defendants’ behalf shall attend in person1.
3
4
3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages.
5
The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in
6
person may result in the imposition of sanctions. In addition, the conference will not
7
proceed and will be reset to another date.
8
4. Parties are directed to submit confidential settlement statements no later than
9
November 5, 2020 to dmcorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff shall mail his
10
confidential settlement statement to Attn: Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota, USDC
11
CAED, 2986 Bechelli Lane, Suite 300, Redding, California 96002 so it arrives no later
12
than November 5, 2020. The envelope shall be marked “CONFIDENTIAL
13
SETTLEMENT STATEMENT.” Parties are also directed to file a “Notice of
14
Submission of Confidential Settlement Statement” (See L.R. 270(d)).
15
16
Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on
17
any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked “confidential” with
18
the date and time of the settlement conference indicated prominently thereon.
19
////
20
////
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district court has the
authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement
conferences… .” United States v. United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d 1051,
1053, 1057, 1059 (9th Cir. 2012)(“the district court has broad authority to compel participation in mandatory
settlement conference[s].”). The term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals attending the
mediation conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any
settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648,
653 (7th Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d 1385, 1396 (9th Cir. 1993).
The individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the
settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz.
2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 2003 WL 23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The
purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the parties’ view of
the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D. at 486. An authorization to
settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to comply with the requirement of full
authority to settle. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596-97 (8th Cir. 2001).
1
2
1
2
The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length,
3
typed or neatly printed, and include the following:
4
a. A brief statement of the facts of the case.
5
b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon
6
which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of
7
prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in
8
dispute.
9
c. A summary of the proceedings to date.
10
d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, and
11
trial.
12
e. The relief sought.
13
f. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a
14
history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands.
15
g. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the settlement
16
conference, including how much a party is willing to accept and/or willing to pay.
17
h. If the parties intend to discuss the joint settlement of any other actions or claims
18
not in this suit, give a brief description of each action or claim as set forth above,
19
including case number(s) if applicable.
20
5. Judge Cota or another representative from the court will be contacting the parties
21
either by telephone or in person, approximately two weeks prior to the settlement
22
conference, to ascertain each party’s expectations of the settlement conference.
23
6. The deadline for filing a Joint Pretrial Statement (November 20, 2020) and date
24
for convening a status conference re: trial setting (February 12, 2021), set by
25
order filed October 6, 2020 (ECF No. 42), shall remain in place pending further
26
order of this court.
27
////
28
////
3
1
2
7. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Litigation Office
3
at California State Prison, Sacramento, via facsimile at (916) 294-3072 or via email.
4
DATED: October 9, 2020
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?