(PC) Faultry v. Saechao et al

Filing 51

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/5/2021 ORDERING Plaintiff to separately file his portion of the joint pretrial statement within 14 days of the filing of this order. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES B. FAULTRY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:18-cv-1850 KJM AC P ORDER J. SAECHAO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed October 6, 2020, the parties were ordered to prepare a joint pretrial 19 statement that defendant’s counsel was to file on or before November 20, 2020. ECF No. 42. 20 Defendant requested and was granted an extension of the deadline to December 30, 2020. ECF 21 No. 48. Counsel for defendant has now filed the statement, which lacks input from plaintiff, and 22 explains that plaintiff’s positions are missing because counsel has yet to receive plaintiff’s input 23 on the joint statement. ECF No. 50-1 at 2. Counsel further explains that the joint statement was 24 filed after the deadline because he waited a few extra days in case plaintiff’s response was 25 delayed. Id. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. Within fourteen days of the filing of this order, plaintiff shall separately file his 28 portion of the joint pretrial statement. Failure to comply may result in the imposition of 1 1 appropriate sanctions, up to dismissal of this action based on the degree of plaintiff’s 2 noncompliance. 3 2. In the event counsel for defendant receives plaintiff’s comments on the joint pretrial 4 statement before plaintiff files them, counsel shall promptly file the comments with the court. 5 DATED: January 5, 2021 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?