Pringle v. Cardall et al

Filing 115

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/14/20 ORDERING that 114 plaintiff's motion for reconsideration be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

----oo0oo----

11
12

PAMELA DENISE PRINGLE,

13

Plaintiff,
v.

14
15
16
17
18

No.

2:18-cv-02035 WBS KJN

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION

BRENT CARDALL, COUNTY OF YOLO,
YOLO COUNTY PROBATION
DEPARTMENT, SANDY JONES, AMANDA
GENTRY, NOEL BARLOW-HUST, CINDY
McDONALD, MARK ALAN KUBINSKI,
ELISA SUE MAGNUSON, JOHN DOES 120, and JANE DOES 1-20,
inclusive,

19
Defendants.
20
----oo0oo----

21

On October 14, 2020, plaintiff moved for

22
23

reconsideration of the court’s September 30, 2020 order granting

24

her request for attorney’s fees and costs.

25

114.)

26

persuaded thereby to change its decision.

27

respond to her motion would only serve to needlessly increase the

28

attorney’s fees on both sides.

(See Docket Nos. 113,

The court has considered plaintiff’s objections and is not

1

Requiring defendant to

1

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for

2

reconsideration be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.

3

Dated:

October 14, 2020

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2