(PC) Gibbs v. Shasta County et al

Filing 12

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/9/20 ADOPTING 11 Findings and Recommendations. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. (Kaminski, H)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

ROBERT A. GIBBS,

5
6
7

No. 2:18-cv-02261 JAM AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

SHASTA COUNTY, et al.,

8

Defendants.

9
10

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

11

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

12

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

13

On August 12, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

14

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

15

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff has

16

not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

17

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

18

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

19

ORDERED that:

20

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 12, 2020, are adopted in full; and

21

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. See Local Rule

22

110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

23
24
25

DATED: September 9, 2020
/s/ John A. Mendez____________

_____

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

26
27
28
1