(PC) Gibbs v. Shasta County et al

Filing 12

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/9/20 ADOPTING 11 Findings and Recommendations. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 ROBERT A. GIBBS, 5 6 7 No. 2:18-cv-02261 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SHASTA COUNTY, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 11 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 12 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 13 On August 12, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 14 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 15 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff has 16 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 17 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 18 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 19 ORDERED that: 20 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 12, 2020, are adopted in full; and 21 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. See Local Rule 22 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 23 24 25 DATED: September 9, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?