(PS) Hammerbeck v. County of Shasta

Filing 42

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2021 ADOPTING 41 Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 37 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING 33 Motion as moot; and The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD KEVIN HAMMERBECK, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:18-CV-2289-JAM-DMC v. ORDER COUNTY OF SHASTA, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. The matter was 17 18 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. 19 On March 9, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 21 objections within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations 22 have been filed. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 9, 2021, are adopted in 4 2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 37, is granted; 5 3. Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 33, seeking unspecified relief is denied as 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. 3 6 7 full; moot; and 8 9 10 11 DATED: April 26, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?