(PS) Hammerbeck v. County of Shasta
Filing
42
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2021 ADOPTING 41 Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 37 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING 33 Motion as moot; and The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD KEVIN HAMMERBECK,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:18-CV-2289-JAM-DMC
v.
ORDER
COUNTY OF SHASTA,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. The matter was
17
18
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.
19
On March 9, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file
21
objections within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations
22
have been filed.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
23
24
supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed March 9, 2021, are adopted in
4
2.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 37, is granted;
5
3.
Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 33, seeking unspecified relief is denied as
4.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.
3
6
7
full;
moot; and
8
9
10
11
DATED: April 26, 2021
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?