(PC) Ramirez v. Director of CDCR, et al
Filing
38
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/14/2021 ADOPTING 37 Findings and Recommendations in full, and DISMISSING 34 Third Amended Complaint, without leave to amend, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALFONSO BOBBY CANTU RAMIREZ,
12
13
No. 2:18-cv-02579-TLN-AC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
14
DIRECTOR OF CDCR, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff Alfonso Bobby Cantu Ramirez (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se,
18
has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to
19
a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On June 2, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 37.) Plaintiff has not filed
23
any timely objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The Court has reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards and finds the findings
25
and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
28
1. The Findings and Recommendations issued June 2, 2021 (ECF No. 37), are
ADOPTED IN FULL;
1
1
2
2. The Third Amended Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a),
without leave to amend, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and
3
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
DATED: July 14, 2021
6
7
8
9
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?