(PC) Muhammad v. Kesterson et al

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/14/2020 ADOPTING 12 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action without prejudice because it is duplicative of plaintiff's related case, Muhammad v. Seibel et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-2831 WBS AC P, which proceeds on a Second Amended Complaint. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KWESI MUHAMMAD,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:18-cv-2775 WBS AC P

v.

ORDER

KATHERYN KESTERSON, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, pursues this civil rights action seeking relief

17
18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On September 24, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

20
21

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

22

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 12. Plaintiff

23

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 13.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

24
25

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

26

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

27

analysis.

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 24, 2020, are adopted in full; and

3

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice because duplicative of plaintiff’s related

4

case, Muhammad v. Seibel et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-2831 WBS AC P, which proceeds on a

5

Second Amended Complaint.

6

Dated: October 14, 2020

7
8
9
10
11
12

muha2775.805

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2