(PS) Bos v. Grissom et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/7/2019 ADOPTING 22 Findings and Recommendations in full, GRANTING Defendants' 11 Motion to Dismiss, DISMISSING Case without leave to amend and with prejudice, and DENYING Plaintiff's 25 Motion to Include After-Discovery Evidence. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TAMARA L. BOS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:18-CV-2976-JAM-DMC v. ORDER TAMMY GRISSOM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action alleging violations of 17 18 the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On July 10, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 22 within the time specified therein. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have 23 been filed. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 25 304(f), this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 26 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 27 proper analysis. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 10, 2019, are adopted in full; 3 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11) is granted; 4 3. This action is dismissed without leave to amend and with prejudice; 5 4. Plaintiff’s “Motion to Include After-Discovery Evidence” (ECF No. 25) is 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. 6 7 denied; and 8 9 10 DATED: October 7, 2019 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?