(SS) Pettingill v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/9/2019 EXTENDING Time to 11/12/2019, for Plaintiff to file a Reply to 19 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. (York, M)

1

4

SHELLIE LOTT, SBN: 246202
Cerney Kreuze & Lott, LLP
42 N. Sutter Street, Suite 400
Stockton, California 95202
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5

Attorney for Plaintiff

2
3

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SACRAMENTO BRANCH

9
10
11

MICHAEL PAUL PETTINGILL,

12
13

Plaintiff,
vs.

14
15

Case No.: 2:18-cv-02979-EFB

ANDREW SAUL,
Commissioner of Social Security,

16

STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER
EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO
FILE A REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S
CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

Defendant

17
18
19
20

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective
undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff’s time to file a Reply to

21

Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby
22
23
24
25
26

extended to the new due date of November 12, 2019.
This extension (30 days) is requested because the brief writer has an extremely heavy
briefing schedule with multiple briefs in Federal court and in her administrative cases, as well as
numerous hearings in the next several weeks. The attorney needs additional time to review the

27
28

document and record prior to filing the Reply to the Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary
Judgment.

1
2

DATED: October 9, 2019

/s/ Shellie Lott
SHELLIE LOTT
Attorney for Plaintiff

DATED: October 9, 2019

McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

/s/ Esther Kim
ESTHER KIM,
(As authorized via E-mail on 10/4/19)
Special Assistant U S Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant

1

4

SHELLIE LOTT, SBN: 246202
Cerney Kreuze & Lott, LLP
42 N. Sutter Street, Suite 400
Stockton, California 95202
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5

Attorney for Plaintiff

2
3

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SACRAMENTO BRANCH

10
11
12

MICHAEL PAUL PETTINGILL,
Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.

15

ANDREW SAUL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

16

Case No.: 2:18-cv-02979-EFB

[proposed] ORDER EXTENDING
PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO FILE A REPLY
TO DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

17

Defendant
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties for a requested first extension of Plaintiff’s time
to file a Reply to Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, the request is hereby
APPROVED.
Plaintiff shall file her Reply to Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on or
before November 12, 2019.
SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

DATED: October, 9, 2019
HON. EDMUND F. BRENNAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE