(PC) Welk v. California Department of Corrections

Filing 39

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/4/21 ADOPTING 32 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Reece, Laufik, Ichimaru, Snyder, Smith, and Lozano are dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD JAMES WELK, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. No. 2:18-cv-3008 MCE AC P ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 9, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 32. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 36. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 9, 2021, ECF No. 32, are adopted in 3 4 5 6 7 full; 2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Reece, Laufik, Ichimaru, Snyder, Smith, and Lozano are dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 4, 2021 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?