Sullivan III et al v. United States et al
Filing
38
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/20/2020 ORDERING that the parties shall have until 1/29/2021, to meet and confer as required by FRCP 26(f) regarding their discovery plan.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
GORDON W. EGAN (SBN 111470)
SIGNATURE LAW GROUP LLP
3400 Bradshaw Road, Suite A4-A
Sacramento, CA 95827
Telephone: (916) 362-2660
Fax: (916) 880-5255
gegan@signaturelawgroup.com
Attorney for Plaintiffs
6
7
UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JAMES J. SULLIVAN III; JAHANSHIR J.
)
)
JAVANIFARD; GAYLE JAVANIFARD;
)
)
DANIEL H. SAYAH; SULLIVAN III, LLC, a )
)
)
California limited liability company;
)
)
MALKAH J, LLC, a California limited
)
)
liability company; PETER P. PEREZ and
)
GLORIA A. PEREZ, as trustees of the PETER )
)
PAUL AND GLORIA ANN PEREZ FAMILY )
)
REVOCABLE TRUST established April 25, )
)
)
2013
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and )
)
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, )
)
)
a Delaware corporation
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 18-cv-03066-MCE
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
COMPLETE RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE;
ORDER THEREON
Complaint Filed: November 27, 2018
1
James J. Sullivan III vs. United States of America – Stip. to Further Extend Time
1
RECITALS
2
WHEREAS, on November 27, 2018, Plaintiff James J. Sullivan III, et al. (“Sullivan”)
3
commenced the above-captioned action by filing a Complaint to Quiet Title and for Declaratory
4
Relief (“Complaint”) against Defendants United States of America (“United States”) and Union
5
Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”). (ECF No. 1.)
6
7
WHEREAS, on August 11, 2020, the Court entered its order dismissing the United States
as a party to the action leaving only plaintiffs and Union Pacific. (ECF No. 34.)
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
WHEREAS, since early January 2019, respective counsel for Sullivan and UP have been
meeting and conferring regarding the action in an effort to reach an amicable resolution of this
matter.
WHEREAS, the deadline for the parties to meet and confer pursuant to Rule 26(f) is
November 16, 2020.
WHEREAS, respective counsel for Sullivan and Union continue engaging in discussions
and efforts aimed at reaching a non-judicial resolution of this matter.
WHEREAS, in light of these ongoing settlement efforts, Sullivan and Union Pacific
16
agree that the deadline for the parties to meet and confer as required by Federal Rule of Civil
17
Procedure 26(f) should be further continued to January 29, 2021.
18
19
STIPULATION
20
21
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Sullivan, by and through its counsel of
22
record, Gordon W. Egan of Signature Law Group, LLP, and Union Pacific by and through its
23
counsel of record, Nancy J. Johnson of Berliner Cohen, that the parties shall have until January
24
29, 2021 to meet and confer as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) regarding their
25
discovery plan.
26
DATED: November 16, 2020
27
28
SIGNATURE LAW GROUP LLP
By: /s/ Gordon W. Egan
_
GORDON W. EGAN
Attorney for James J. Sullivan III, et al
2
James J. Sullivan III vs. United States of America – Stip. to Further Extend Time
1
DATED: November 16, 2020
BERLINER COHEN, LLP
2
By: /S/ Nancy J. Johnson (as authorized on 11-162020)
NANCY J. JOHNSON
Attorneys for Defendant Union Pacific
Railroad Company
3
4
5
6
ORDER
7
8
9
Pursuant to the stipulation between the parties, (ECF No. 37), and good cause appearing,
10
the parties shall have until January 29, 2021, to meet and confer as required by Federal Rule of
11
Civil Procedure 26(f) regarding their discovery plan.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 20, 2020
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
James J. Sullivan III vs. United States of America – Stip. to Further Extend Time
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?