Sullivan III et al v. United States et al

Filing 38

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/20/2020 ORDERING that the parties shall have until 1/29/2021, to meet and confer as required by FRCP 26(f) regarding their discovery plan.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 GORDON W. EGAN (SBN 111470) SIGNATURE LAW GROUP LLP 3400 Bradshaw Road, Suite A4-A Sacramento, CA 95827 Telephone: (916) 362-2660 Fax: (916) 880-5255 gegan@signaturelawgroup.com Attorney for Plaintiffs 6 7 UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAMES J. SULLIVAN III; JAHANSHIR J. ) ) JAVANIFARD; GAYLE JAVANIFARD; ) ) DANIEL H. SAYAH; SULLIVAN III, LLC, a ) ) ) California limited liability company; ) ) MALKAH J, LLC, a California limited ) ) liability company; PETER P. PEREZ and ) GLORIA A. PEREZ, as trustees of the PETER ) ) PAUL AND GLORIA ANN PEREZ FAMILY ) ) REVOCABLE TRUST established April 25, ) ) ) 2013 ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ) ) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ) ) ) a Delaware corporation ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) CASE NO.: 18-cv-03066-MCE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO COMPLETE RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE; ORDER THEREON Complaint Filed: November 27, 2018 1 James J. Sullivan III vs. United States of America – Stip. to Further Extend Time 1 RECITALS 2 WHEREAS, on November 27, 2018, Plaintiff James J. Sullivan III, et al. (“Sullivan”) 3 commenced the above-captioned action by filing a Complaint to Quiet Title and for Declaratory 4 Relief (“Complaint”) against Defendants United States of America (“United States”) and Union 5 Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”). (ECF No. 1.) 6 7 WHEREAS, on August 11, 2020, the Court entered its order dismissing the United States as a party to the action leaving only plaintiffs and Union Pacific. (ECF No. 34.) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 WHEREAS, since early January 2019, respective counsel for Sullivan and UP have been meeting and conferring regarding the action in an effort to reach an amicable resolution of this matter. WHEREAS, the deadline for the parties to meet and confer pursuant to Rule 26(f) is November 16, 2020. WHEREAS, respective counsel for Sullivan and Union continue engaging in discussions and efforts aimed at reaching a non-judicial resolution of this matter. WHEREAS, in light of these ongoing settlement efforts, Sullivan and Union Pacific 16 agree that the deadline for the parties to meet and confer as required by Federal Rule of Civil 17 Procedure 26(f) should be further continued to January 29, 2021. 18 19 STIPULATION 20 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Sullivan, by and through its counsel of 22 record, Gordon W. Egan of Signature Law Group, LLP, and Union Pacific by and through its 23 counsel of record, Nancy J. Johnson of Berliner Cohen, that the parties shall have until January 24 29, 2021 to meet and confer as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) regarding their 25 discovery plan. 26 DATED: November 16, 2020 27 28 SIGNATURE LAW GROUP LLP By: /s/ Gordon W. Egan _ GORDON W. EGAN Attorney for James J. Sullivan III, et al 2 James J. Sullivan III vs. United States of America – Stip. to Further Extend Time 1 DATED: November 16, 2020 BERLINER COHEN, LLP 2 By: /S/ Nancy J. Johnson (as authorized on 11-162020) NANCY J. JOHNSON Attorneys for Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company 3 4 5 6 ORDER 7 8 9 Pursuant to the stipulation between the parties, (ECF No. 37), and good cause appearing, 10 the parties shall have until January 29, 2021, to meet and confer as required by Federal Rule of 11 Civil Procedure 26(f) regarding their discovery plan. 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 20, 2020 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 James J. Sullivan III vs. United States of America – Stip. to Further Extend Time

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?