United States of America v. Approximately $80,000.00 in U.S. Currency et al
Filing
2
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/16/2018 ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be EXTENDED to 2/16/2018. (Washington, S)
4
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN
Assistant U. S. Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
5
Attorneys for the United States
1
2
3
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
2:18-MC-00005-MCE-DB
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME
FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE
AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT
ALLEGING FORFEITURE
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14 APPROXIMATELY $80,000.00 IN U.S.
CURRENCY, and
15
APPROXIMATELY $33,740.00 IN U.S.
16 CURRENCY,
17
Defendants.
18
19
It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and potential claimant Paris
20 D. Evans (“claimant”), by and through their respective counsel, as follows:
21
1.
On or about October 20, 2017, claimant filed a claim in the administrative forfeiture
22 proceeding with the Drug Enforcement Administration with respect to the Approximately $80,000.00 in
23 U.S. Currency and Approximately $33,740.00 in U.S. Currency (hereafter “defendant currency”), which
24 was seized on August 14, 2017.
25
2.
The Drug Enforcement Administration has sent the written notice of intent to forfeit
26 required by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(1)(A) to all known interested parties. The time has expired for any
27 person to file a claim to the defendant currency under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(2)(A)-(E), and no person other
28 than claimant has filed a claim to the defendant currency as required by law in the administrative
1
Stipulation and Order to Extend Time
29
1 forfeiture proceeding.
2
3.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a complaint for
3 forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant
4 currency is subject to forfeiture within ninety days after a claim has been filed in the administrative
5 forfeiture proceeding, unless the court extends the deadline for good cause shown or by agreement of the
6 parties. That deadline is January 18, 2018.
7
4.
As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the parties wish by agreement to extend to
8 February 16, 2018, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture
9 against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is
10 subject to forfeiture.
11
5.
Accordingly, the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be
12 required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment
13 alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be extended to February 16, 2018.
14 Dated: 1/11/18
15
16
17
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
By:
/s/ Kevin C. Khasigian
KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN
Assistant U.S. Attorney
18
19 Dated: 1/11/18
20
21
22
/s/ Jonathan M. Brayman
JONATHAN M. BRAYMAN
Attorney for potential claimant
Paris D. Evans
(Signature authorized by phone)
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
2
Stipulation and Order to Extend Time
1
2
ORDER
The deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against
3 the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to
4 forfeiture shall be extended to not later than February 16, 2018.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 Dated: January 16, 2018
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
3
Stipulation and Order to Extend Time
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?