(PC) In Re: Steven Wayne Bonilla
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/18/2023 ORDERING that Plaintiff may not file the complaint in the referenced matter because it attempts to obtain relief related to plaintiff's Alameda County conviction. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to return 388 , 389 , 390 , 391 , 392 and 393 complaints to plaintiff.(Huang, H)
Case 2:18-mc-00197-KJM-KJN Document 397 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE: STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA,
No. 2: 18-mc-197 KJM KJN P (ECF Nos.
388, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393.)
NOTICE AND ORDER RE: FILING
BY VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Plaintiff, Steven Wayne Bonilla, has attempted to initiate a new civil action. According
to the pre-filing order in Case No. 2:18-cv-2544 JAM KJN P (see ECF No. 13), plaintiff has
been identified as a vexatious litigant who is not permitted to initiate any new habeas corpus
petitions or civil actions without leave of court so that the court can determine if the new action
attempts to obtain relief related to plaintiff’s Alameda County conviction, including actions
which purport to be against other courts, individuals, or agencies on the ground that they failed to
overturn or vacate the Alameda County conviction. The court has reviewed the complaint in
accordance with the pre-filing order and finds that:
☐ Plaintiff’s action does not attempt to obtain relief related to plaintiff’s Alameda County
☒ Plaintiff’s action attempts to obtain relief related to plaintiff’s Alameda County
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff
☐ may file the complaint in the above-referenced matter and the Clerk of the Court
is directed to file the complaint and assign a civil case number.
☒ may not file the complaint in the above-referenced matter because it attempts to
obtain relief related to plaintiff’s Alameda County conviction. The Clerk of the
Court is directed to return the complaint to plaintiff.
Dated: January 18, 2023
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?