(PC) In Re: Steven Wayne Bonilla
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/09/20 ORDERING may not file the complaints/petitions in the above-referenced matters because they attempt to obtain relief related to plaintiffs Alameda County conviction. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the pleadings ECF 40 - 44 to plaintiff. (Plummer, M)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE: STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA
No. 2: 18-mc-197 JAM KJN P (ECF Nos. 4044.)
NOTICE AND ORDER RE: FILING
BY VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Plaintiff, Steven Wayne Bonilla, has attempted to initiate new civil actions. According to
the pre-filing order in Case No. 2:18-cv-2544 JAM KJN P (see ECF No. 13), plaintiff has been
identified as a vexatious litigant who is not permitted to initiate any new habeas corpus petitions
or civil actions without leave of court so that the court can determine if the new action attempts
to obtain relief related to plaintiff’s Alameda County conviction, including actions which purport
to be against other courts, individuals, or agencies on the ground that they failed to overturn or
vacate the Alameda County conviction. The court has reviewed plaintiff’s pleadings in
accordance with the pre-filing order and finds that:
☐ Plaintiff’s action does not attempt to obtain relief related to plaintiff’s Alameda County
conviction.
☒ Plaintiff’s actions attempt to obtain relief related to plaintiff’s Alameda County
conviction.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff
☐ may file the complaint in the above-referenced matter and the Clerk of the Court
is directed to file the complaint and assign a civil case number.
☒ may not file the complaints/petitions in the above-referenced matters because they
attempt to obtain relief related to plaintiff’s Alameda County conviction. The
Clerk of the Court is directed to return the pleadings to plaintiff.
Dated: January 9, 2020
Bonilla.vexscreen(2)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?