Clark et al v. City of Sacramento et al

Filing 96

ORDER signed by Senior Judge John A. Mendez on 9/15/22 DISMISSING this case with prejudice. All parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO Dale K. Galipo (Bar No. 144074) 2 dalekgalipo@yahoo.com 3 Eric Valenzuela (Bar No. 284500) evalenzuela@galipolaw.com 4 21800 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 310 Woodland Hills, California 91367 5 Telephone: (818) 347-3333 Facsimile: (818) 347-4118 6 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEPHEN CLARK, et. al., Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 2:19-cv-00171-JAM (EFB) ORDER STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 16 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et. al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1 ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Plaintiffs’ Complaint, Case No. 2:19- 3 cv-00171-JAM (EFB) is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. All parties shall bear 4 their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED 7 8 9 DATED: September 15, 2022 10 11 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?