Clark et al v. City of Sacramento et al
Filing
96
ORDER signed by Senior Judge John A. Mendez on 9/15/22 DISMISSING this case with prejudice. All parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
1 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO
Dale K. Galipo (Bar No. 144074)
2 dalekgalipo@yahoo.com
3 Eric Valenzuela (Bar No. 284500)
evalenzuela@galipolaw.com
4 21800 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 310
Woodland Hills, California 91367
5 Telephone: (818) 347-3333
Facsimile: (818) 347-4118
6
7
8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STEPHEN CLARK, et. al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Case No. 2:19-cv-00171-JAM (EFB)
ORDER STIPULATION TO
DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
16 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et. al.,
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
1 ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Plaintiffs’ Complaint, Case No. 2:19-
3 cv-00171-JAM (EFB) is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. All parties shall bear
4 their own costs and attorneys’ fees.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED
7
8
9 DATED: September 15, 2022
10
11
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?