(PC) Strelz v. Jackson et al
Filing
49
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/15/2021 ADOPTING 48 Findings and Recommendations in full; This action is DISMISSED for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the local rules and with court orders. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BRADY LEE STRELZ,
12
No. 2:19-cv-00183-TLN-DB
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
JACKSON, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff Brady Lee Strelz (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this
17
18
civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United
19
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On December 15, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 48.) Neither
23
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
24
25
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
26
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
27
///
28
///
1
1
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
2
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed December 15, 2020 (ECF No. 48), are
5
6
7
8
9
ADOPTED IN FULL; and
2. This action is DISMISSED for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the local rules and
with court orders. See L.R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 15, 2021
10
11
12
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?