Warden v. Cowan et al
Filing
165
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/3/2025 GRANTING 164 Motion for Administrative Relief. Up to two of Plaintiff's legal representatives (either counsel or certified law students) shall be permitted to attend the 1/24/2025, settlement conference, commencing at 9:30 AM, with Plaintiff at CSP-Los Angeles County, at no charge to the parties. (Deputy Clerk HAH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MASA NATHANIEL WARDEN,
12
No. 2:19-CV-0431-TLN-AC-P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
B. COWAN, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding with appointed counsel, brings this civil rights
17
18
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's unopposed motion for
19
administrative relief. See ECF No. 164.
Plaintiff seeks an order permitting up to two of his legal representatives (either
20
21
counsel or certified law students) to appear personally with him at California State Prison – Los
22
Angeles County for a settlement conference before the undersigned via Zoom on January 24,
23
2025, at 9:30 a.m., at no charge to the parties. Good cause appearing therefor, Plaintiff's
24
unopposed motion will be granted. A writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum will issue
25
separately.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
2
1.
Plaintiff's unopposed motion for administrative relief, ECF No. 164, is
2.
Up to two of Plaintiff's legal representatives (either counsel or certified law
3
granted.
4
5
students) shall be permitted to attend the January 24, 2025, settlement conference, commencing at
6
9:30 a.m., with Plaintiff at California State Prison – Los Angeles County, at no charge to the
7
parties.
8
9
Dated: January 3, 2025
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?