(PC) Garcia v. Win et al

Filing 46

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 10/16/2020 DENYING 43 , 44 , and 45 Motions because the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not allow for such a pleading. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOSE ABEL GARCIA,

12

No. 2:19-CV-0434-TLN-DMC-P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

HLA WIN, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42

18

U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions, ECF Nos. 43 and 45, for an

19

extension of time to file a “responsive pleading of opposition” to Defendants’ answer. Also

20

before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 44, for modification of the Court’s July 1, 2020,

21

scheduling order to permit him to file a response to Defendants’ answer. Plaintiff’s motions are

22

denied because the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not allow for such a pleading.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

Dated: October 16, 2020
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1