(PC) Patton v. Loadholt et al

Filing 100

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/13/2021 ORDERING 98 that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge 95 is AFFIRMED. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTHONY L. PATTON,

12
13
14

No. 2: 19-cv-0451-KJM-KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

F.N.P. LOADHOLT, et al.,

15

Defendant.

16
17

With reference to the mailbox rule, on December 28, 2020, plaintiff filed a request for

18

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed December 15, 2020, denying plaintiff’s

19

motion for additional discovery. ECF No. 95. As provided by E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a

20

magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon

21

review of the file, the court finds the magistrate judge’s ruling was not clearly erroneous or

22

contrary to law.

23

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

24

magistrate judge filed December 15, 2020, is affirmed.

25

DATED: July 13, 2021.

26
27
28
1