(PC) Patton v. Loadholt et al

Filing 100

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/13/2021 ORDERING 98 that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge 95 is AFFIRMED. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY L. PATTON, 12 13 14 No. 2: 19-cv-0451-KJM-KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER F.N.P. LOADHOLT, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 With reference to the mailbox rule, on December 28, 2020, plaintiff filed a request for 18 reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed December 15, 2020, denying plaintiff’s 19 motion for additional discovery. ECF No. 95. As provided by E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a 20 magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon 21 review of the file, the court finds the magistrate judge’s ruling was not clearly erroneous or 22 contrary to law. 23 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the 24 magistrate judge filed December 15, 2020, is affirmed. 25 DATED: July 13, 2021. 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?