(PC) Williams v. Spearman et al

Filing 52

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/19/2021 DISMISSING this action with prejudice and ORDERING Plaintiff to pay sanctions of $1000.00 payable to the Clerk of Court of the Eastern District of California within 14 days of the date of this order. CASE CLOSED. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
Case 2:19-cv-00486-MCE-DB Document 52 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GENTRY WILLIAMS, 12 No. 2: 19-cv-0486 MCE DB P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 ORDER J. FANNON, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 17 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons stated herein, this action is dismissed with prejudice. On May 25, 2021, the undersigned conducted a settlement conference in this action. This 19 20 action settled. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, defendant agreed to pay plaintiff $2500 21 and the parties agreed to dismiss this action with prejudice. 1 At the settlement conference, the undersigned instructed plaintiff to prepare and send 22 23 defendant a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice of this action. Upon receipt of the notice 24 of dismissal, the undersigned directed defendant to sign and file the notice of dismissal within 25 thirty days of May 25, 2021. 26 27 28 1 At the settlement conference, the parties agreed that the transcript from the settlement conference would be the formal settlement agreement. (See ECF No. 47 (transcript from settlement conference).) 1 Case 2:19-cv-00486-MCE-DB Document 52 Filed 07/19/21 Page 2 of 3 1 2 Following the settlement conference, defendant provided the court with proof of payment of the settlement money. 3 Plaintiff did not comply with the order to send defendant the notice of dismissal. Instead, 4 plaintiff filed a document titled “Private Settlement Agreement and Release of All Claims on 5 Defendant J. Fannon.” (ECF No. 49.) This document is not a notice of voluntary dismissal with 6 prejudice. This document also misrepresents the terms of the settlement and does not contain 7 defendant Fannon’s signature. 8 On June 25, 2021, the undersigned ordered plaintiff to mail defendant Fannon a signed 9 notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice within fourteen days of the order. (ECF No. 50.) 10 The undersigned ordered defendant to sign and file this notice within thirty days of the order. 11 (Id.) If defendant Fannon did not receive the notice from plaintiff within fourteen days, the 12 undersigned directed defendant Fannon to notify the court. (Id.) In the June 25, 2021 order, the 13 undersigned cautioned plaintiff that failure to comply with the order may result in the imposition 14 of monetary sanctions. (Id.) 15 On July 14, 2021, defendant Fannon filed a notice stating that he did not receive a notice 16 of voluntary dismissal from plaintiff within fourteen days of the June 25, 2021 order. (ECF No. 17 51.) Accordingly, for the reasons stated on the record at the May 25, 2021 settlement 18 19 conference, this action is dismissed with prejudice. (See ECF No. 47.) In addition, within 20 fourteen days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall pay sanctions of $1000.00 for his failure to 21 comply with the June 25, 2021 order directing him to send defendant Fannon a notice of 22 voluntary dismissal with prejudice. See Local Rule 110 (“Failure of counsel or a party to comply 23 with …any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all 24 sanctions … within the inherent power of the Court.”) 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 2 Case 2:19-cv-00486-MCE-DB Document 52 Filed 07/19/21 Page 3 of 3 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 2. Within fourteen days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall pay sanctions of $1000.00 4 5 This action is dismissed with prejudice; payable to the Clerk of Court of the Eastern District of California. Dated: July 19, 2021 6 7 8 9 Will486.fin 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?