(PC) Williams v. Spearman et al
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/19/2021 DISMISSING this action with prejudice and ORDERING Plaintiff to pay sanctions of $1000.00 payable to the Clerk of Court of the Eastern District of California within 14 days of the date of this order. CASE CLOSED. (Henshaw, R)
Case 2:19-cv-00486-MCE-DB Document 52 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GENTRY WILLIAMS,
12
No. 2: 19-cv-0486 MCE DB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
ORDER
J. FANNON,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
17
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons stated herein, this action is dismissed with prejudice.
On May 25, 2021, the undersigned conducted a settlement conference in this action. This
19
20
action settled. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, defendant agreed to pay plaintiff $2500
21
and the parties agreed to dismiss this action with prejudice. 1
At the settlement conference, the undersigned instructed plaintiff to prepare and send
22
23
defendant a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice of this action. Upon receipt of the notice
24
of dismissal, the undersigned directed defendant to sign and file the notice of dismissal within
25
thirty days of May 25, 2021.
26
27
28
1
At the settlement conference, the parties agreed that the transcript from the settlement
conference would be the formal settlement agreement. (See ECF No. 47 (transcript from
settlement conference).)
1
Case 2:19-cv-00486-MCE-DB Document 52 Filed 07/19/21 Page 2 of 3
1
2
Following the settlement conference, defendant provided the court with proof of payment
of the settlement money.
3
Plaintiff did not comply with the order to send defendant the notice of dismissal. Instead,
4
plaintiff filed a document titled “Private Settlement Agreement and Release of All Claims on
5
Defendant J. Fannon.” (ECF No. 49.) This document is not a notice of voluntary dismissal with
6
prejudice. This document also misrepresents the terms of the settlement and does not contain
7
defendant Fannon’s signature.
8
On June 25, 2021, the undersigned ordered plaintiff to mail defendant Fannon a signed
9
notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice within fourteen days of the order. (ECF No. 50.)
10
The undersigned ordered defendant to sign and file this notice within thirty days of the order.
11
(Id.) If defendant Fannon did not receive the notice from plaintiff within fourteen days, the
12
undersigned directed defendant Fannon to notify the court. (Id.) In the June 25, 2021 order, the
13
undersigned cautioned plaintiff that failure to comply with the order may result in the imposition
14
of monetary sanctions. (Id.)
15
On July 14, 2021, defendant Fannon filed a notice stating that he did not receive a notice
16
of voluntary dismissal from plaintiff within fourteen days of the June 25, 2021 order. (ECF No.
17
51.)
Accordingly, for the reasons stated on the record at the May 25, 2021 settlement
18
19
conference, this action is dismissed with prejudice. (See ECF No. 47.) In addition, within
20
fourteen days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall pay sanctions of $1000.00 for his failure to
21
comply with the June 25, 2021 order directing him to send defendant Fannon a notice of
22
voluntary dismissal with prejudice. See Local Rule 110 (“Failure of counsel or a party to comply
23
with …any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all
24
sanctions … within the inherent power of the Court.”)
25
////
26
////
27
////
28
////
2
Case 2:19-cv-00486-MCE-DB Document 52 Filed 07/19/21 Page 3 of 3
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
2. Within fourteen days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall pay sanctions of $1000.00
4
5
This action is dismissed with prejudice;
payable to the Clerk of Court of the Eastern District of California.
Dated: July 19, 2021
6
7
8
9
Will486.fin
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?