Mazik et al v. Kaiser Permanente, Inc. et al

Filing 69

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/28/2022 STAYING this action. No response to the pleadings is required until 30 days after the court in the Consolidated Cases rules on all first-to-file motions. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership 2 Including Professional Corporations CHARLES L. KREINDLER, Cal. Bar No. 119933 3 BARBARA E. TAYLOR, Cal. Bar No. 166374 MATTHEW LIN, Cal. Bar No. 328852 4 333 South Hope Street, 43rd Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-1422 5 Telephone: 213.620.1780 Facsimile: 213.620.1398 ckreindler@sheppardmullin.com btaylor@sheppardmullin.com mlin@sheppardmullin.com 7 6 E mail 8 Attorneys for Defendants KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC. 9 and KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, INC. and proposed 10 Defendants THE PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, INC., SOUTHERN 11 CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, and COLORADO 12 PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, 13 P.C. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 UNITED STATES et al. ex rel. 18 JEFFREY MAZIK, 19 20 Plaintiffs, v. 21 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH 22 PLAN, INC., KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, INC., and THE 23 PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUPS, 24 Defendants. 25 26 Case No. 2:19-cv-0559 JAM-KJN JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: (1) AMENDMENT OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SERVICE; AND (2) STAY OF CASE Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez Complaint Filed: First Amended Complaint Filed: Trial Date: April 1, 2019 April 2, 2021 None Set 27 28 SMRH:4865-9154-7403.1 Case No. 2:19-cv-0559 JAM-KJN JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 2 JOINT STIPULATION Pursuant to Local Rule 143, Qui Tam Plaintiff-Relator Jeffrey Mazik 3 (“Relator”), Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. (“KFHP”) and Kaiser 4 Foundation Hospitals, Inc. (“KFH”), and proposed Defendants The Permanente 5 Medical Group, Inc., Southern California Permanente Medical Group, and Colorado 6 Permanente Medical Group, P.C. (collectively, with KFHP and KFH, the “Kaiser 7 Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and request 8 as follows: 9 WHEREAS this qui tam False Claims Act (“FCA”) action was filed under 10 seal on April 1, 2019, and on April 2, 2021, Relator filed, under seal, the First 11 Amended Complaint (“FAC”); 12 WHEREAS on December 1, 2021, the FAC was ordered unsealed after the 13 United States declined to intervene in this action and the Court ordered Relator to 14 serve the Defendants; 15 WHEREAS the FAC has not yet been served on Defendants KFHP and KFH; 16 WHEREAS in the FAC, Relator named as Defendants The Permanente 17 Medical Groups, which was intended to include three related but distinct medical 18 group entities: The Permanente Medical Group, Inc., Southern California 19 Permanente Medical Group, and Colorado Permanente Medical Group, P.C.; 20 WHEREAS there are six consolidated qui tam FCA cases, filed from 2013 21 through 2020, pending in the Northern District of California, in which the 22 Government has partially intervened: (1) U.S. ex rel. Osinek v. Kaiser Permanente, 23 No. 3:13-cv-03891-EMC; (2) U.S. ex rel. Arefi v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, 24 Inc., No. 3:16-cv-01558-EMC (originally filed in 2015); (3) U.S. ex rel. Stein v. 25 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-05337-EMC; (4) U.S. ex rel. 26 Bryant v. Kaiser Permanente, No. 3:18-cv-1347-EMC; (5) U.S. ex rel. Bicocca v. 27 Permanente Medical Group, Inc., No. 3:21-cv-03124-EMC (originally filed in 28 SMRH:4865-9154-7403.1 -2- Case No. 2:19-cv-0559 JAM-KJN JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 2020); and (6) U.S. ex rel. Taylor v. Kaiser Permanente, No. 3:21-cv-03894 2 (originally filed in 2014) (collectively, the “Consolidated Cases”); 3 WHEREAS the Consolidated Cases all allege that various combinations of 4 the Kaiser Defendants and other Kaiser entities “submitted claims to the Medicare 5 Advantage Program . . . for risk-adjustment payments for diagnoses that . . . patients 6 did not actually have and/or that were not actually addressed by the treating 7 physician during a patient encounter” (see U.S. ex rel. Osinek v. Kaiser Permanente, 8 No. 3:13-cv-03891-EMC, Dkt. No. 61 at 5); 9 WHEREAS on December 29, 2021, the presiding judge in the Consolidated 10 Cases, Hon. Edward M. Chen, ordered that the defendants in the Consolidated Cases 11 may file motions to dismiss under the FCA’s “first-to-file” provision (31 U.S.C. 12 §3730(b)(5)), a bar that provides that after a relator brings a qui tam action “no 13 person other than the government may intervene or bring a related action based on 14 the facts underlying the pending action,” and following the court’s ruling on such 15 motions, may then file any remaining Rule 12(b) motions to dismiss forty-five days 16 after entry of an order on all first-to-file motions (see U.S. ex rel. Osinek v. Kaiser 17 Permanente, No. 3:13-cv-03891-EMC, Dkt. No. 129); 18 WHEREAS the first-to-file motions in the Consolidated Cases will be heard 19 on March 31, 2022 (see id.); 20 WHEREAS Defendants KFHP and KFH and proposed Defendants The 21 Permanente Medical Group, Inc., Southern California Permanente Medical Group, 22 and Colorado Permanente Medical Group, P.C. believe that this action is vulnerable 23 to a first-to-file motion, as Relator also claims that Kaiser Defendants violated the 24 FCA and includes allegations regarding submissions to the Medicare Advantage 25 Program; 26 WHEREAS, Relator believes that this non-consolidated action is not 27 vulnerable to a first-to-file motion in connection with the Consolidated Cases, in 28 part because this case involves diagnoses and claims by “outside providers” rather SMRH:4865-9154-7403.1 -3- Case No. 2:19-cv-0559 JAM-KJN JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 than treating physicians during patient “encounters,” and he intends to vigorously 2 oppose any such motion; but Relator nevertheless does not object to the Kaiser 3 Defendants’ position that it would serve the interests of the Parties and this Court to 4 stay proceedings in this action until a ruling in the Consolidated Cases on the first5 to-file motions; 6 WHEREAS a stay of this action for several months until a ruling in the 7 Consolidated Cases on all first-to-file motions will result in relatively minimal delay 8 and will not serve to alter the date of any event or deadline fixed by this Court to 9 date. 10 NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by and between Relator and the 11 Kaiser Defendants that: 12 1. Defendants KFHP and KHF accept service of the FAC. 13 2. The Permanente Medical Group, Inc., Southern California Permanente 14 Medical Group, and Colorado Permanente Medical Group, P.C. will accept service 15 of the FAC as a substitute for the parties erroneously named as “The Permanente 16 Medical Groups,” and references in the FAC to the “Permanente Medical Groups” 17 will be deemed amended to refer to The Permanente Medical Group, Inc., Southern 18 California Permanente Medical Group, and Colorado Permanente Medical Group, 19 P.C. 20 3. This action is stayed, and no response to the pleadings is required, until 21 thirty days after the court in the Consolidated Cases rules on all first-to-file motions. 22 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / SMRH:4865-9154-7403.1 -4- Case No. 2:19-cv-0559 JAM-KJN JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 Dated: January 28, 2022 2 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON 3 LLP 4 5 By /s/ Charles L. Kreindler CHARLES L. KREINDLER 6 7 Attorneys for Defendants KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC. and KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, INC. and proposed Defendants THE PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, INC., SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, and COLORADO PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, P.C. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Dated: January 28, 2022 POLLOCK COHEN LLP 16 17 By: 18 19 [as authorized on January 28, 2022] /s/ Adam L. Pollock ADAM L. POLLOCK Attorneys for Plaintiff-Relator JEFFREY MAZIK 20 21 22 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 Dated: January 28, 2022 27 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 28 SMRH:4865-9154-7403.1 -5- Case No. 2:19-cv-0559 JAM-KJN JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?