Mazik et al v. Kaiser Permanente, Inc. et al
Filing
69
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/28/2022 STAYING this action. No response to the pleadings is required until 30 days after the court in the Consolidated Cases rules on all first-to-file motions. (Coll, A)
1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
A Limited Liability Partnership
2 Including Professional Corporations
CHARLES L. KREINDLER, Cal. Bar No. 119933
3 BARBARA E. TAYLOR, Cal. Bar No. 166374
MATTHEW LIN, Cal. Bar No. 328852
4 333 South Hope Street, 43rd Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071-1422
5 Telephone: 213.620.1780
Facsimile: 213.620.1398
ckreindler@sheppardmullin.com
btaylor@sheppardmullin.com
mlin@sheppardmullin.com
7
6 E mail
8 Attorneys for Defendants KAISER
FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC.
9 and KAISER FOUNDATION
HOSPITALS, INC. and proposed
10 Defendants THE PERMANENTE
MEDICAL GROUP, INC., SOUTHERN
11 CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE
MEDICAL GROUP, and COLORADO
12 PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP,
13
P.C.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
UNITED STATES et al. ex rel.
18 JEFFREY MAZIK,
19
20
Plaintiffs,
v.
21 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH
22 PLAN, INC., KAISER FOUNDATION
HOSPITALS, INC., and THE
23 PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUPS,
24
Defendants.
25
26
Case No. 2:19-cv-0559 JAM-KJN
JOINT STIPULATION AND
ORDER RE:
(1) AMENDMENT OF FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
SERVICE; AND
(2) STAY OF CASE
Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez
Complaint Filed:
First Amended
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
April 1, 2019
April 2, 2021
None Set
27
28
SMRH:4865-9154-7403.1
Case No. 2:19-cv-0559 JAM-KJN
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
1
2
JOINT STIPULATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 143, Qui Tam Plaintiff-Relator Jeffrey Mazik
3 (“Relator”), Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. (“KFHP”) and Kaiser
4 Foundation Hospitals, Inc. (“KFH”), and proposed Defendants The Permanente
5 Medical Group, Inc., Southern California Permanente Medical Group, and Colorado
6 Permanente Medical Group, P.C. (collectively, with KFHP and KFH, the “Kaiser
7 Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and request
8 as follows:
9
WHEREAS this qui tam False Claims Act (“FCA”) action was filed under
10 seal on April 1, 2019, and on April 2, 2021, Relator filed, under seal, the First
11 Amended Complaint (“FAC”);
12
WHEREAS on December 1, 2021, the FAC was ordered unsealed after the
13 United States declined to intervene in this action and the Court ordered Relator to
14 serve the Defendants;
15
WHEREAS the FAC has not yet been served on Defendants KFHP and KFH;
16
WHEREAS in the FAC, Relator named as Defendants The Permanente
17 Medical Groups, which was intended to include three related but distinct medical
18 group entities: The Permanente Medical Group, Inc., Southern California
19 Permanente Medical Group, and Colorado Permanente Medical Group, P.C.;
20
WHEREAS there are six consolidated qui tam FCA cases, filed from 2013
21 through 2020, pending in the Northern District of California, in which the
22 Government has partially intervened: (1) U.S. ex rel. Osinek v. Kaiser Permanente,
23 No. 3:13-cv-03891-EMC; (2) U.S. ex rel. Arefi v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,
24 Inc., No. 3:16-cv-01558-EMC (originally filed in 2015); (3) U.S. ex rel. Stein v.
25 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-05337-EMC; (4) U.S. ex rel.
26 Bryant v. Kaiser Permanente, No. 3:18-cv-1347-EMC; (5) U.S. ex rel. Bicocca v.
27 Permanente Medical Group, Inc., No. 3:21-cv-03124-EMC (originally filed in
28
SMRH:4865-9154-7403.1
-2-
Case No. 2:19-cv-0559 JAM-KJN
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
1 2020); and (6) U.S. ex rel. Taylor v. Kaiser Permanente, No. 3:21-cv-03894
2 (originally filed in 2014) (collectively, the “Consolidated Cases”);
3
WHEREAS the Consolidated Cases all allege that various combinations of
4 the Kaiser Defendants and other Kaiser entities “submitted claims to the Medicare
5 Advantage Program . . . for risk-adjustment payments for diagnoses that . . . patients
6 did not actually have and/or that were not actually addressed by the treating
7 physician during a patient encounter” (see U.S. ex rel. Osinek v. Kaiser Permanente,
8 No. 3:13-cv-03891-EMC, Dkt. No. 61 at 5);
9
WHEREAS on December 29, 2021, the presiding judge in the Consolidated
10 Cases, Hon. Edward M. Chen, ordered that the defendants in the Consolidated Cases
11 may file motions to dismiss under the FCA’s “first-to-file” provision (31 U.S.C.
12 §3730(b)(5)), a bar that provides that after a relator brings a qui tam action “no
13 person other than the government may intervene or bring a related action based on
14 the facts underlying the pending action,” and following the court’s ruling on such
15 motions, may then file any remaining Rule 12(b) motions to dismiss forty-five days
16 after entry of an order on all first-to-file motions (see U.S. ex rel. Osinek v. Kaiser
17 Permanente, No. 3:13-cv-03891-EMC, Dkt. No. 129);
18
WHEREAS the first-to-file motions in the Consolidated Cases will be heard
19 on March 31, 2022 (see id.);
20
WHEREAS Defendants KFHP and KFH and proposed Defendants The
21 Permanente Medical Group, Inc., Southern California Permanente Medical Group,
22 and Colorado Permanente Medical Group, P.C. believe that this action is vulnerable
23 to a first-to-file motion, as Relator also claims that Kaiser Defendants violated the
24 FCA and includes allegations regarding submissions to the Medicare Advantage
25 Program;
26
WHEREAS, Relator believes that this non-consolidated action is not
27 vulnerable to a first-to-file motion in connection with the Consolidated Cases, in
28 part because this case involves diagnoses and claims by “outside providers” rather
SMRH:4865-9154-7403.1
-3-
Case No. 2:19-cv-0559 JAM-KJN
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
1 than treating physicians during patient “encounters,” and he intends to vigorously
2 oppose any such motion; but Relator nevertheless does not object to the Kaiser
3 Defendants’ position that it would serve the interests of the Parties and this Court to
4 stay proceedings in this action until a ruling in the Consolidated Cases on the first5 to-file motions;
6
WHEREAS a stay of this action for several months until a ruling in the
7 Consolidated Cases on all first-to-file motions will result in relatively minimal delay
8 and will not serve to alter the date of any event or deadline fixed by this Court to
9 date.
10
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by and between Relator and the
11 Kaiser Defendants that:
12
1.
Defendants KFHP and KHF accept service of the FAC.
13
2.
The Permanente Medical Group, Inc., Southern California Permanente
14 Medical Group, and Colorado Permanente Medical Group, P.C. will accept service
15 of the FAC as a substitute for the parties erroneously named as “The Permanente
16 Medical Groups,” and references in the FAC to the “Permanente Medical Groups”
17 will be deemed amended to refer to The Permanente Medical Group, Inc., Southern
18 California Permanente Medical Group, and Colorado Permanente Medical Group,
19 P.C.
20
3.
This action is stayed, and no response to the pleadings is required, until
21 thirty days after the court in the Consolidated Cases rules on all first-to-file motions.
22
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
23 / / /
24 / / /
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
SMRH:4865-9154-7403.1
-4-
Case No. 2:19-cv-0559 JAM-KJN
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
1 Dated: January 28, 2022
2
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON
3
LLP
4
5
By
/s/ Charles L. Kreindler
CHARLES L. KREINDLER
6
7
Attorneys for Defendants KAISER
FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC. and
KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, INC.
and proposed Defendants THE
PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, INC.,
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE
MEDICAL GROUP, and COLORADO
PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, P.C.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 Dated: January 28, 2022
POLLOCK COHEN LLP
16
17
By:
18
19
[as authorized on January 28, 2022]
/s/ Adam L. Pollock
ADAM L. POLLOCK
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Relator JEFFREY
MAZIK
20
21
22
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
Dated: January 28, 2022
27
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
28
SMRH:4865-9154-7403.1
-5-
Case No. 2:19-cv-0559 JAM-KJN
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?