(SS) (PS) Ritchison v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
8
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/10/2019 ADOPTING in FULL 7 Findings and Recommendations, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's order. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROSEANN L. RITCHINSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:19-cv-00602 JAM AC
v.
ORDER
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a
18
19
United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
20
On September 6, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff has
23
not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 6, 2019, are adopted in full; and
27
28
////
1
1
2
2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to
comply with the court’s order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110.
3
4
Dated: October 10, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?