(PS)Johnson v. Vigen
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/13/2020 ADOPTING 14 Findings and Recommendations, DISMISSING this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TODD LADON JOHNSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:19-cv-00769-KJM-KJN PS
ORDER
v.
LAUREN VIGEN,
15
Defendant.
16
On March 5, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were
17
18
served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and
19
recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and
20
21
recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to
22
keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service
23
of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United
24
25
States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
26
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
27
1983).
28
/////
1
1
2
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.
3
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
4
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 5, 2020, are ADOPTED;
5
2. This action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
6
41(b); and
7
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
8
DATED: October 13, 2020.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?