(PS) Walrath v. Doan

Filing 16

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/7/2019 ADOPTING 11 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. This action is REMANDED to the Sacramento County Superior Court. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ASHLEY M. WALRATH, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:19-cv-0811 JAM DB PS ORDER WILLIAM DOAN, 15 Defendant. 16 Defendant is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States 17 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On July 9, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 19 20 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings 22 and recommendations. Defendant has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 9, 2019 (ECF No. 11) are adopted in full; 3 2. Defendant’s May 8, 2019 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied; 4 5 6 and 3. This action is remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court. DATED: October 7, 2019 7 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 _____ /walrath0811.jo 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?