(PS) Tautau v. Los Angeles Police Department et al

Filing 4

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/9/2020 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim as set forth in the 3 order. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 TWYLLA TAUTAU, 11 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:19-cv-826-JAM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF THE WORLD, Defendants. 17 18 On August 6, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 19 § 1915(e)(2). The court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, explained the 20 deficiencies therein, and granted plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to 21 cure the deficiencies. ECF No. 3. The order warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended 22 complaint could result in the dismissal of this action. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff 23 has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Thus, it appears 24 that plaintiff is unable to cure the defects in the complaint. 25 26 Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim as set forth in the August 6, 2020 order (ECF No. 3). 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 1 1 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 2 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 3 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 4 objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 5 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 6 appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 7 v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 8 Dated: September 9, 2020. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?