(PS) Staffin v. Bosenko et al
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 01/17/23 ADOPTING 14 Findings and Recommendations in full and DEYNING as MOOT 13 Request. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim. CASE CLOSED (Licea Chavez, V)
Case 2:19-cv-01058-KJM-DMC Document 16 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHRISTOPHER DALE STAFFIN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:19-CV-01058-KJM-DMC
v.
ORDER
TOM BOSENKO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. The matter was
17
18
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern District of California local
19
rules.
On September 19, 2022, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations,
20
21
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections
22
within the time specified therein. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have
23
been filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304,
24
25
this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds
26
the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
27
/////
28
/////
1
Case 2:19-cv-01058-KJM-DMC Document 16 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 2
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed September 19, 2022, are adopted
4
2.
This action is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim;
5
3.
Plaintiff’s request, ECF No. 13, is denied as moot; and
6
4.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.
3
7
in full;
DATED: January 17, 2023.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?