(PC) Rodriguez v. Albonico et al

Filing 87

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/17/22 DENYING 86 Motion for Extension of Time. (Woodworth, M.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID ARNOLD RODRIGUEZ, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:19-cv-1108 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER N. ALBONICO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983, has requested an extension of time to file an amended response to defendants’ objections 19 to the September 7, 2022 findings and recommendations. ECF No. 86. He seeks additional time 20 to obtain historical versions of the California regulations governing inmate appeals. Id. Because 21 plaintiff has already filed two responses to defendants’ objections (ECF Nos. 84, 85) and this 22 court has access to the historical regulations, the motion for extension will be denied. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time 24 (ECF No. 86) is DENIED. 25 DATED: November 17, 2022 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?