Arroyo v. Mehrabi, et al.

Filing 45

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/3/22 DENYING 44 Motion for Reconsideration.(Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

----oo0oo----

11
12

RAFAEL ARROYO, JR.,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

No. 2:19-cv-1147 WBS CKD

v.

ORDER

KARIM MEHRABI; STARS HOLDING CO.
LLC, a California Limited
Liability Company; AND DOES 110,

17

Defendants.

18
19

----oo0oo----

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Defendants filed objections (Docket No. 44) to the
court’s order on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Docket
No. 43.)

The court considers defendants’ “objections” to be

equivalent to a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Local Rule
230(j).
Although plaintiff submitted photographic evidence
showing that the placement of the restroom mirror and toilet
paper dispenser violated the Americans with Disabilities Act

28
1

1

(Docket No. 40-6), defendants did not avail themselves of the

2

opportunity to provide contradicting evidence, if any existed, to

3

demonstrate the existence of a genuine dispute of material fact

4

on that question.

5

Defendants’ motion (Docket No. 44) is accordingly

6

DENIED.

7

Dated:

March 3, 2022

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2