McCoy et al v. City of Vallejo et al
Filing
135
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/19/2021 CONTINUING the 128 Motion to Compel Hearing to 12/15/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney (via Zoom).(Coll, A) Modified on 11/19/2021 (Streeter, J).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
420 SIERRA COLLEGE DRIVE, SUITE 140
GRASS VALLEY, CA 95945-5091
C o l a n t u o n o , H i g h s m i t h & W h a t l e y, P C
10
11
12
13
14
VERONICA A.F. NEBB
City Attorney, State Bar No. 140001
RANDY J. RISNER
Chief Assistant City Attorney, State Bar No. 172552
KATELYN M. KNIGHT
Assistant City Attorney, State Bar No. 264573
CITY OF VALLEJO, City Hall
555 Santa Clara Street
Vallejo, California 94590
Telephone: (707) 648-4545
Facsimile: (707) 648-4687
Email: katelyn.knight@cityofvallejo.net
MICHAEL G. COLANTUONO, State Bar No. 143551
MColantuono@chwlaw.us
JOHN A. ABACI, State Bar No. 166493
JAbaci@chwlaw.us
ANDREW C. RAWCLIFFE, State Bar No. 259224
ARawcliffe@chwlaw.us
NIKHIL S. DAMLE, State Bar No. 297350
NDamle@chwlaw.us
COLANTUONO, HIGHSMITH & WHATLEY, PC
420 Sierra College Drive, Suite 140
Grass Valley, California 95945-5091
Telephone: (530) 432-7357
Facsimile: (530) 432-7356
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF VALLEJO, ANDREW BIDOU, MARK
THOMPSON, BRYAN GLICK, ANTHONY ROMERO16 CANO, COLIN EATON, JORDON PATZER, STEVEN
DARDEN, AND KYLE WYLIE
15
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
21
22
CASE NO.: 2:19-cv-01191-JAM-CKD
KORI MCCOY, etc., et al.,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
Plaintiffs,
v.
23 CITY OF VALLEJO, etc., et al.,
24
25
Complaint Filed:
SAC Filed:
Trial Date:
Discovery Cut-off:
Motion Cut-off:
Defendants.
26
June 27, 2019
March 26, 2021
January 30, 2023
June 3, 2022
July 15, 2022
27
28
1
270428.1
Case No. 2:19-cv-01191-JAM-CKD
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO
COMPEL DISCOVERY
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Plaintiffs Kori McCoy, Marc McCoy,
2
Louis McCoy, Shawnmell Mitchell, Marquita McCoy, and Barbara Dorsey (“Plaintiffs”) and
3
Defendants City of Vallejo, Andrew Bidou, Mark Thompson, Bryan Glick, Anthony Romero-Cano,
4
Colin Eaton, Jordon Patzer, Steven Darden, Kyle Wylie and Ryan McMahon (“Defendants”),
5
referred to collectively as the “Parties,” by and through their designated counsel, that:
6
WHEREAS, on November 1, 2021, Plaintiffs filed with this Court a Notice of Discovery
2021, at 10:00 A.M. before the Honorable Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney, in the United
9
States District Court, Eastern District of California, Robert T. Matsui United States Courthouse, 500
10
420 SIERRA COLLEGE DRIVE, SUITE 140
GRASS VALLEY, CA 95945-5091
Dispute and Motion to Compel Disclosures pursuant to Local Rule 251, to be heard on December 1,
8
C o l a n t u o n o , H i g h s m i t h & W h a t l e y, P C
7
I Street, Sacramento, California 95814, Courtroom 24, 8th Floor (via Zoom). The motion arises out
11
of a discovery dispute between the Plaintiffs and the City.
12
WHEREAS, in accordance with Local Rule 251, the Plaintiffs and Defendants are required
13
to file a Joint Statement Re Discovery Disagreement by no later than November 24, 2021, in order
14
for the motion to remain on calendar.
15
WHEREAS, this date falls on a week during which the Thanksgiving holidays will occur and
16
several people (especially employees of public agencies like Defendant City) typically take, and will
17
be on, vacation throughout the week. Accordingly, availability for persons through their work
18
schedules will be more limited during the time that a Joint Statement would need to be prepared and
19
filed with the Court than nearly every other week of the year.
20
WHEREAS, for these reasons, City has requested that the hearing scheduled for December 1,
21
2021, be rescheduled to allow an additional two weeks for the Joint Statement to be filed in a timely
22
manner under Local Rule 251.
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, counsel of record for City and the Plaintiffs have contacted the Deputy Clerk
and determined that the date of December 15, 2021, is available for a hearing on the motion.
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, through their undersigned counsel below, hereby stipulate
and agree:
1. The hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion shall be continued from December 1, 2021, to
December 15, 2021, at 10:00 A.M. before the Honorable Magistrate Judge Carolyn K.
2
270428.1
Case No. 2:19-cv-01191-JAM-CKD
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO
COMPEL DISCOVERY
1
Delaney, in the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Robert T.
2
Matsui United States Courthouse, 500 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814, Courtroom
3
24, 8th Floor (via Zoom).
4
2. The Parties hereby request the Court to enter the Proposed Order set forth below.
5
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
6
Dated: November 19, 2021
7
8
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
420 SIERRA COLLEGE DRIVE, SUITE 140
GRASS VALLEY, CA 95945-5091
C o l a n t u o n o , H i g h s m i t h & W h a t l e y, P C
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
270428.1
Case No. 2:19-cv-01191-JAM-CKD
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO
COMPEL DISCOVERY
1
DATED: November 18, 2021
2
/s/ John A. Abaci
JOHN A. ABACI
Attorneys for Defendants
City of Vallejo, Andrew Bidou, Mark Thompson,
Bryan Glick, Anthony Romero-Cano, Colin Eaton,
Jordon Patzer, Steven Darden, and Kyle Wylie
3
4
5
6
DATED: November 18, 2021
7
/s/ Patrick M. Buelna
PATRICK M. BUELNA
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
8
9
420 SIERRA COLLEGE DRIVE, SUITE 140
GRASS VALLEY, CA 95945-5091
C o l a n t u o n o , H i g h s m i t h & W h a t l e y, P C
10
DATED: November 18, 2021
11
/s/ Derick E. Konz
DERICK E. KONZ
Attorneys for Defendant Ryan McMahon
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
270428.1
Case No. 2:19-cv-01191-JAM-CKD
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO
COMPEL DISCOVERY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?