De Picciotto v. Seneca Healthcare District et al

Filing 20

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/11/2020 ORDERING that the deadline for Defendants' answer to 15 First Amended Complaint will be 5 court days after the Court enters an order on 17 Motion to Dismiss. (Huang, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6

MARK S. POSARD (SBN: 208790)
[e-mail]
JUDITH A. CREGAN (SBN: 208779)
[e-mail]
GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP
3 Park Center Drive, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
SENECA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT and LINDA WAGNER

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP
3 Park Center Drive, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825

10
11

FRED DE PICCIOTTO,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
vs.
SENECA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT;
LINDA WAGNER, an individual; and DOES
1 through 25, inclusive,

16

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:19-CV-01297-TLN-DMC
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF’S’
COMPLAINT
Hon. Troy L. Nunley

17
18

ORDER

19

After considering the parties Stipulation for An Extension of Time to Answer or

20

Otherwise Plead filed on September 10, 2020, the Court finds good cause exists under Federal

21

Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 6 (b)(1)(A) for an extention of time for Defendants SENECA

22

HEALTHCARE DISTRICT and LINDA WAGNER to answer Plaintiff FRED DE

23

PICCIOTTO’s First Amended Complaint. The deadline for Defendants’ answer will be five

24

court days after the Court enters an order on Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 11, 2020

27
28

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF’S’
COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 2:19-CV-01297-TLN-DMC