(HC) Iniguez v. Thompson

Filing 30

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/18/2020 ADOPTING in full 19 Findings and Recommendations. Respondent's 9 motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the case DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The Court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CRUZ INIGUEZ, 12 No. 2:19-cv-1318 WBS JDP P Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 PAUL THOMPSON, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of 17 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 1, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 1, 2020, are adopted in full; 3 2. Respondent’s January 9, 2020, motion to dismiss (ECF No. 9) is granted and the case 4 dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; and 5 3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 6 2253. 7 Dated: November 18, 2020 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?