(PC) Wilkins v. Barber et al
Filing
148
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/16/2021 ADOPTING in FULL 140 Findings and Recommendations. DENYING 119 Motion for Injunctive Relief, and DENYING 144 Motion for recusal of the assigned magistrate judge. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
KEENAN WILKINS, aka NERRAH
BROWN,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:19-cv-1338 WBS KJN P
ORDER
v.
DR. CHRISTINE S. BARBER, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On January 14, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations. Defendants filed no reply.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
1
1
2
On January 25, 2021, plaintiff filed a Motion for Recusal of the assigned magistrate judge.
The motion does not set forth an adequate basis for recusal. See 28 U.S.C. §144.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 14, 2021 (ECF No. 140), are adopted
5
in full;
6
2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 119) is denied; and
7
3. Plaintiff’s motion for recusal of the assigned magistrate judge (ECF No. 144) is denied.
8
Dated: February 16, 2021
9
10
11
12
/wilk1338.805.3
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?