(PC) Ramirez v. Unknown

Filing 6

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/10/19 ADOPTING in full 5 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING this action without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN RAZO RAMIREZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-1391 JAM DB P v. ORDER UNKNOWN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On [date], the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were 21 served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the 23 findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 30, 2019 (ECF No. 5) are adopted in full; and 1 1 2 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. 3 4 Dated: October 10, 2019 /s/ John A. Mendez HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?