USA v. Bradley et al

Filing 20

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/14/2021 ADOPTING 19 Findings and Recommendations in full, and GRANTING 16 Motion for Default Judgment. Judgment is ENTERED in Plaintiff's favor and against Defendants as follows: Defendant Richard E. Bradley is indebted to the United States in the amount of $308,400.30, as of 1/29/2021, less any subsequent payments or credits, plus interest and other statutory additions, until the judgment is fully paid; The United States has val id federal tax liens against all of defendant Richard E. Bradley's property and rights to property, including the subject property; The United States may foreclose its liens upon the subject property, with the proceeds to be distributed per the Court's findings as to the validity and priority of the liens and claims of all parties; The Court retains jurisdiction over this action pending the United States' filing of a motion for order of sale and the Court later confirming any judicial sale; and The United States shall file a status report every 90 days addressing whether proceeding with a forced sale of the subject property is appropriate until a motion for order of sale is filed. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-01466-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER RICHARD E. BRADLEY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff United States of America seeks to reduce to judgment outstanding federal tax 18 assessments made against Defendant Richard Bradley and foreclose federal tax liens upon real 19 property commonly known as 15696 Meridian Road, Chico, CA 95973 (“subject property”). 20 (ECF No. 16-1 at 2.) Defendant has not answered or otherwise appeared. Plaintiff’s motion for 21 entry of default judgment was heard before the assigned Magistrate Judge on April 29, 2021. The 22 matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 23 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 24 On June 8, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 25 contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 26 filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 27 28 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed June 8, 2021, are ADOPTED IN FULL. 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED. 4 3. Judgment is entered in Plaintiff’s favor and against Defendants as follows: 5 a. Defendant Richard E. Bradley is indebted to the United States in the amount of 6 $308,400.30, as of January 29, 2021, less any subsequent payments or credits, plus interest and 7 other statutory additions, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 6601, 6621, and 6622, and 28 8 U.S.C. § 1961(c)(1), until the judgment is fully paid; 9 10 b. The United States has valid federal tax liens against all of defendant Richard E. Bradley’s property and rights to property, including the subject property; 11 c. The United States may foreclose its liens upon the subject property, with the 12 proceeds to be distributed per the Court’s findings as to the validity and priority of the liens and 13 claims of all parties; d. The Court retains jurisdiction over this action pending the United States’ filing 14 15 of a motion for order of sale and the Court later confirming any judicial sale; and 16 e. The United States shall file a status report every 90 days addressing whether 17 proceeding with a forced sale of the subject property is appropriate until a motion for order of sale 18 is filed. 19 DATED: July 14, 2021 20 21 22 23 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?