(PC) Koch v. Rosenfield
Filing
10
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/3/2019 ADOPTING 8 Findings and Recommendations in full. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROLAND THOMAS KOCH,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:19-cv-1474 JAM DB P
v.
ORDER
KENNETH ROSENFIELD,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff, a civil committee proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking
17
18
relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 22, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 22, 2019, are adopted in full; and
3
2. This action is dismissed with prejudice.
4
5
6
Dated October 3, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?