(PC) McCoy-Gordon v. Hernandez, et al.
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/13/2020 GRANTING 41 Application. Plaintiff's deposition may be taken via video conference, with the plaintiff, the deposition reporter, and defense counsel in separate locations and such deposition testimony shall be admissible to the same extent as if the deposition were taken in person. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
Case No. 2:19-cv-1586 JAM KJN P
DeMARREA McCOY-GORDON,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
Plaintiff, DEFENDANT’S APPLICATION TO
MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
12
13
v.
14
15
HERNANDEZ,
16
Defendant.
17
18
Defendant applied ex parte for an order to take Plaintiff’s deposition via remote video
19
conference, with the Plaintiff, the deposition reporter, and defense counsel to be in separate
20
locations. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
21
1. Defendant’s Application (ECF No. 41) is granted.
22
2. Plaintiff’s deposition may be taken via video conference, with the plaintiff, the
23
deposition reporter, and defense counsel in separate locations and such deposition testimony shall
24
be admissible to the same extent as if the deposition were taken in person.
25
Dated: October 13, 2020
26
27
28
/mcco1586.dep
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?