(PC) McCoy-Gordon v. Hernandez, et al.

Filing 42

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/13/2020 GRANTING 41 Application. Plaintiff's deposition may be taken via video conference, with the plaintiff, the deposition reporter, and defense counsel in separate locations and such deposition testimony shall be admissible to the same extent as if the deposition were taken in person. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No. 2:19-cv-1586 JAM KJN P DeMARREA McCOY-GORDON, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff, DEFENDANT’S APPLICATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER 12 13 v. 14 15 HERNANDEZ, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Defendant applied ex parte for an order to take Plaintiff’s deposition via remote video 19 conference, with the Plaintiff, the deposition reporter, and defense counsel to be in separate 20 locations. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. Defendant’s Application (ECF No. 41) is granted. 22 2. Plaintiff’s deposition may be taken via video conference, with the plaintiff, the 23 deposition reporter, and defense counsel in separate locations and such deposition testimony shall 24 be admissible to the same extent as if the deposition were taken in person. 25 Dated: October 13, 2020 26 27 28 /mcco1586.dep

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?