(PS) Strojnik v. Capitol Regency, LLC
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/8/21 DENYING as moot 25 Motion to Amend the Complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to file pages 39-69 of plaintiff's motion 25 at 39-69) as plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, add as an additional defendant in this case "Hyatt Hotels Corporation, doing business as Hyatt Hotels & Resorts" and issue a summons for such additional defendant. (Kaminski, H)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PETER STROJNIK, SR.,
No. 2:19-cv-01587-MCE-KJN PS
CAPITOL REGENCY, LLC, et al.,
(ECF No. 25)
Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint. (ECF No. 25.)
The motion was not properly noticed for hearing under this court’s local rules, see L.R. 230, but
given the procedural posture of the case, no motion is actually required for plaintiff to amend the
complaint at this juncture. The pretrial scheduling order in this case contemplated amendment of
the pleadings and permitted plaintiff to move to amend by December 31, 2020. (ECF No. 20
at 2.) In keeping with this deadline, plaintiff filed the instant motion to amend on December 22,
2020. (ECF No. 25.) This was exactly 20 days after the (then only) defendant, Capitol Regency,
LLC, had filed its answer to the original complaint on December 2, 2020.1 (ECF No. 23.)
Under Rule 15(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “a party may amend its
pleading once as a matter of course” within 21 days of service of a responsive pleading, such as
Defendant originally filed an unsigned answer on November 30, 2020, which the clerk’s office
rejected. (ECF No. 21.)
an answer. As plaintiff’s motion was filed—along with a copy of plaintiff’s proposed amended
complaint—within 21 days of defendant Capitol Regency’s answer, and plaintiff has not
previously amended his complaint, the instant amendment is allowed “as a matter of course” and
requires no leave of court.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s motion to amend (ECF No. 25) is DENIED as moot;
The Clerk of Court is directed to:
a. file pages 39-69 of plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 25 at 39-69) as plaintiff’s First
b. add as an additional defendant in this case “Hyatt Hotels Corporation, doing
business as Hyatt Hotels & Resorts”; and
c. issue a summons for such additional defendant; and
Upon the Clerk’s filing of the First Amended Complaint, plaintiff shall timely
effect service of the First Amended Complaint upon all defendants in accordance
with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4 and 5.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 8, 2021
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?