Chou v. Carnival Cruise Lines et al
Filing
17
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/10/20 ORDERING that Discovery due by 9/14/2020. Dispositive Motions shall be heard no later than 12/11/2020. Settlement Conference set for 10/1/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD CHOU, M.D., an individual,
12
No. 2:19-cv-01681-KJM-DB
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, an entity of
form unknown; CARNIVAL
CORPORATION, an entity of form
unknown; CARNIVAL CORPORATION
WHICH WILL DO BUSINESS IN
CALIFORNIA AS CARNIVAL CRUISE
LINES, and DOES 2 through 20, inclusive,
15
16
17
18
ORDER
Defendants.
19
20
An initial scheduling conference was held in this case on January 17, 2020.1
21
22
Michael Schaps appeared for plaintiff; Yesenia Gallegos appeared for defendants.
Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on January 10, 2020, and
23
24
discussed a schedule for the case with counsel at the hearing, the court makes the following
25
orders:
26
1
27
28
The court is delayed in issuing this order by a series of events since the initial scheduling
conference. While this order provides the dates reviewed with the parties at the conference, if the
parties wish to propose a modified schedule in light the course of the litigation, they are free to do
so. The order also sets the settlement conference requested by the parties, on an expedited basis.
1
1
I.
2
SERVICE OF PROCESS
All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without
3
leave of court, good cause having been shown.
4
II.
5
ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without
6
leave of court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth
7
Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).
8
III.
9
JURISDICTION/VENUE
Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b) and 28
10
U.S.C. § 1332(a). Jurisdiction and venue are not disputed.
11
IV.
12
DISCOVERY
Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) shall have
13
been completed within twenty-one (21) calendar days of this Order. All discovery shall be
14
completed by September 14, 2020. In this context, “completed” means that all discovery shall
15
have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to
16
discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has
17
been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the
18
magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance with the local rules of this court. While the assigned
19
magistrate judge reviews proposed discovery phase protective orders, requests to seal or redact
20
are decided by Judge Mueller as discussed in more detail below. In addition, while the assigned
21
magistrate judge handles discovery motions, the magistrate judge cannot change the schedule set
22
in this order, except that the magistrate judge may modify a discovery cutoff to the extent such
23
modification does not have the effect of requiring a change to the balance of the schedule.
24
V.
25
26
27
28
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES
The parties do not foresee expert witnesses being necessary in this dispute.
VI.
MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE
All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining
orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than December 11, 2020. The
2
1
parties may obtain available hearing dates by checking Judge Mueller’s page on the court’s
2
website.
3
4
All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule
230 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions; the following provisions also apply:
5
(a)
The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and
6
(b)
When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the
7
opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding the legal holiday.
8
Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to
9
the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651,
10
11
652–53 (9th Cir. 1994).
The court values the importance of training young attorneys. The parties are
12
encouraged to consider assigning oral argument to a young attorney. If a written request for oral
13
argument is filed before a hearing, stating an attorney of four or fewer years out of law school
14
will argue the oral argument, then the court will ordinarily hold the hearing, although the court’s
15
schedule and calendar may require the hearing to be reset. Otherwise, the court may find it
16
appropriate in some actions to submit a motion without oral argument.
17
The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty
18
(20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases
19
must be made in writing at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the motion.
20
Prior to filing a motion in a case in which the parties are represented by counsel,
21
counsel shall engage in a pre-filing meet and confer to discuss thoroughly the substance of the
22
contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Plaintiff’s counsel should carefully evaluate
23
the defendant’s contentions as to deficiencies in the complaint and in many instances the party
24
considering a motion should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable defect. Counsel
25
should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion of any kind is filed, including for
26
summary judgment, the briefing is directed only to those substantive issues requiring resolution
27
by the court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other non-substantive matters during
28
the meet and confer. A notice of motion shall contain a certification by counsel filing the
3
1
motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a brief summary of meet and
2
confer efforts.
3
The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could
4
have been tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off
5
date may constitute waiver of such issue.
6
VII.
7
SEALING
No document will be sealed, nor shall a redacted document be filed, without the
8
prior approval of the court. If a document for which sealing or redaction is sought relates to the
9
record on a motion to be decided by Judge Mueller, the request to seal or redact should be
10
directed to her and not the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to seal or redact shall be
11
governed by Local Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction); protective orders covering the
12
discovery phase of litigation shall not govern the filing of sealed or redacted documents on the
13
public docket. The court will only consider requests to seal or redact filed by the proponent of
14
sealing or redaction. If a party plans to make a filing that includes material an opposing party has
15
identified as confidential and potentially subject to sealing, the filing party shall provide the
16
opposing party with sufficient notice in advance of filing to allow for the seeking of an order of
17
sealing or redaction from the court.
18
VIII.
19
FURTHER SCHEDULING
The court will set a Final Pretrial Conference date after the resolution of any
20
dispositive motions, or passage of the dispositive motion cutoff, with a trial date being
21
determined at the pretrial conference. The parties should be prepared to confirm a trial date
22
within 60 to 120 days from the date of the final pretrial conference, and should be available for
23
trial accordingly.
24
IX.
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
25
The parties have expressed interest in appearing for settlement
26
conference. Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan has been randomly selected. A settlement
27
conference is scheduled before Judge Brennan for October 1, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.
28
/////
4
1
The parties are directed to submit confidential settlement conference statements
2
via e-mail (efborders@caed.uscourts.gov) to chambers seven (7) days prior to the settlement
3
conference. Such statements are neither to be filed with the clerk nor served on opposing
4
counsel. However, each party shall e-file a one page document entitled Notice of Submission of
5
Confidential Settlement Conference Statement. The parties may agree, or not, to serve each other
6
with the settlement statements. Each party is reminded of the requirement that it be represented
7
in person at the settlement conference by a person able to dispose of the case or fully authorized
8
to settle the matter at the settlement conference on any terms. See Local Rule 270.
9
X.
10
MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
11
Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court
12
upon a showing of good cause. Agreement of the parties by stipulation alone does not constitute
13
good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or counsel does
14
not constitute good cause.
15
As noted, the assigned magistrate judge is authorized to modify only the discovery
16
dates shown above to the extent any such modification does not impact the balance of the
17
schedule of the case.
18
XI.
19
20
21
22
OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless
objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 10, 2020.
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?