(PC) Tevin L. Harris v. Valencia et al
Filing
109
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/16/2022 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed 1/19/2022, is AFFIRMED. (Zignago, K.)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TEVIN LEE HARRIS,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:19-cv-1751 JAM KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
R. VALENCIA, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On February 7, 2022, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s
18
order filed January 19, 2022, granting defendant’s motion to modify the discovery and scheduling
19
order and granting defendant thirty days to file a motion to compel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule
20
303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.”
21
Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate
22
judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
23
24
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the
magistrate judge filed January 19, 2022, is affirmed.
25
26
27
28
DATED: March 16, 2022
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
