(PS) Wilson et al v. Raye et al
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 1/7/2021 ADOPTING in full 7 findings and recommendations and DENYING 2 plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's 5 amended complaint is DISMISSED without further leave to amend. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NICOLUIS E. WILSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:19-cv-1754 MCE DB PS
v.
ORDER
VANCE RAYE, et al.,
15
Defendants,
16
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States
17
18
Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On October 13, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
19
20
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
21
findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days after service of the findings and
22
recommendations. The thirty-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not filed any objections to
23
the findings and recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 3, 2020 (ECF No. 7) are
3
4
5
6
7
ADOPTED in full;
2. Plaintiff’s September 5, 2019 application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is
DENIED;
3. Plaintiff’s May 21, 2020 amended complaint (ECF No. 5) is DISMISSED without
further leave to amend; and
8
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
Dated: January 7, 2021
11
12
13
14
15
_______________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?