Sentinel Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Filing 31

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/16/2021 MODIFYING The Scheduling Order as follows: Non-Expert Discovery is due by 8/27/2021. Plaintiff's Expert Disclosure due by 9/27/2021. Defendants' Expert Disclosures due by 9/24/2021. Rebuttal Expert Disclosure due by 10/1/2021. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 Matthew Delinko (Bar No. 302832) Bauman Loewe Witt & Maxwell, PLLC 2 8765 East Bell Road, Suite 210 Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 3 Telephone: (480) 502-4664 Facsimile: (480) 502-4774 4 e-mail mdelinko@blwmlawfirm.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Sentinel Insurance Company 6 Kristian Moriarty (Bar No. 291557) kmoriarty@hbblaw.com 7 HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL LLP 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2150 8 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: 916.702.3200 9 Facsimile: 916.570.1947 10 Attorneys for Defendant THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. 11 (erroneously sued herein as “The Home Depot, Inc.”) and NIAGARA 12 CONSERVATION CORPORATION 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, 17 LTD., individually and as subrogee for its insured, Vaughn Kearbey dba Vaughn 18 Kearbey, DDS, Plaintiff, 19 20 v. 21 THE HOME DEPOT, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 - 20, inclusive, 22 Defendants. 23 Case No. 19-CV-01760-WBS-DMC AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AS TO NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE, AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES ONLY AND ORDER THEREON Assigned for All Purposes to: Hon. William B. Shubb Action Filed: Trial Date: August 8, 2019 December 27, 2021 24 25 26 27 TO THE HONORABLE COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, Plaintiff, Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and 28 Case No. 19-CV-01760-WBS-DMC AL09-0000017 13839655.1 1 AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AS TO NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE, AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES ONLY AND ORDER THEREON 1 Niagara Conservation Corporation (“Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of 2 record, as follows: 3 WHEREAS good cause exists for granting this Stipulation to Modify the 4 Scheduling Order previously entered by this Court to Continue the Non-Expert Discovery, 5 and expert discovery deadlines only: 6 1. The Modified Scheduling Order, entered May 21, 2021, sets for the deadline 7 for completion of non-expert discovery as July 14, 2021, the due date for Plaintiff’s expert 8 disclosure as July 23, 2021, the deadline for Defendant’s expert disclosure as August 27, 9 2021, and the rebuttal expert disclosure deadline as September 24, 2021. (5/24/2021 Dkt. 10 Entry No. 28.) 11 2. Discovery is ongoing. Depositions have not been taken but the parties are 12 working to arrange necessary percipient witness depositions, while they endeavor to 13 resolve the case through settlement negotiations. Plaintiff and Defendants have each 14 served one set of discovery requests, to which all parties have responded. The current 15 deadline for completion of non-expert discovery is July 14, 2021. 16 3. At present, the parties and the Court continue to face the unprecedented and 17 ongoing COVID-19 pandemic with hopes that it will continue to improve with the 18 availability of vaccines and continued compliance with health and government directives. 19 4. Despite the limited re-openings across the state, the parties are still 20 concerned with the wellbeing of all witnesses, counsel, court reporters, and staff that 21 would need to participate in any depositions, inspections, or potential mediations, and are 22 currently in the process of substantially limiting interactions with an eye towards public 23 health. 24 5. Parties remain optimistic that after further ongoing discovery and 25 investigation, the case can be resolved through mediation and if need be, will work to 26 create contingency plans for possible telephonic depositions and/or mediation once the 27 parties have exhausted settlement efforts 28 Case No. 19-CV-01760-WBS-DMC AL09-0000017 13839655.1 2 AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AS TO NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE, AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES ONLY AND ORDER THEREON 1 6. The Parties met and conferred and agreed to stipulate to continue the present 2 Non-Expert Discovery Deadline, and expert discovery deadlines, in anticipation of the 3 need to continue in their discovery efforts, make any special provisions to complete 4 discovery given the ongoing pandemic, and hopefully resolve the case informally or 5 through mediation. 6 7. The current Non-Expert Discovery deadline is July 14, 2021; 7 8. The current Expert Disclosure/Exchange of Report deadlines are as follows: 8 a. Plaintiff: July 23, 2021; 9 b. Defendant: August 27, 2021; 10 c. Rebuttal: September 24, 2021; 11 9. The current Pre-Trial Conference is October 25, 2021, 1:30 p.m.; 12 10. The current Jury Trial is December 28, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. 13 11. The new cut-off date for non-expert discovery the above-referenced is sought 14 to allow all parties time to exhaust their efforts to resolve the case by settlement through 15 informal discussion or mediation, and conduct the necessary remaining fact and expert 16 discovery prior to trial; 17 12. There have been two (2) prior requests for continuances of scheduling order 18 dates in this matter; however, the parties do not believe a continuance of the present rial 19 date is necessary at this time. 20 13. Since the last request, counsel for Defendants arranged for its expert witness to 21 travel to Sacramento in order to perform an inspection of the toilet that forms the subject of 22 the litigation, perform such inspection, and confer with counsel for defendants regarding 23 same. That was accomplished on June 24, 2021. 24 14. The parties are now endeavoring to negotiate a resolution of this action by 25 informal settlement and, if necessary, private mediation. 26 27 28 / / / Case No. 19-CV-01760-WBS-DMC AL09-0000017 13839655.1 3 AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AS TO NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE, AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES ONLY AND ORDER THEREON 1 IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties 2 that the following proposed schedule govern the non-expert discovery deadline, and the 3 expert discovery deadlines imposed for this case: 4 Type of Appearance 5 Non-Expert discovery cut-off 6 Plaintiff’s Expert Disclosure 7 Defendants’ Expert Disclosure 8 Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Current Stipulated Schedule July 14, 2021 July 23, 2021 August 27, 2021 Stipulated Proposed Case Management Schedule August 27, 2021 August 27, 2021 September 24, 2021 September 24, 2021 October 1, 2021 9 10 11 Dated: July 16, 2021 HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL LLP 12 13 By: /s/ Kristian B. Moriarty Valerie A. Moore Attorneys for Defendant THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. (erroneously sued herein as “The Home Depot, Inc.”) and NIAGARA CONSERVATION CORPORATION 14 15 16 17 18 Dated: July 16, 2021 BAUMAN LOEWE WITT & MAXWELL, PLLC 19 20 By: /s/ Matthew E. Delinko Matthew E. Delinko Attorneys for Plaintiff SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 19-CV-01760-WBS-DMC AL09-0000017 13839655.1 4 AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AS TO NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE, AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES ONLY AND ORDER THEREON 1 ORDER 2 The Court having considered the foregoing stipulation and good cause appearing, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. Non-Expert discovery cut-off is reset for August 27, 2021. 5 2. Plaintiff’s Expert Disclosure is reset for August 27, 2021. 6 3. Defendants’ Expert Disclosure is reset for September 24, 2021. 7 4. Rebuttal Expert Disclosure is reset for October 1, 2021. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: July 16, 2021 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 19-CV-01760-WBS-DMC AL09-0000017 13839655.1 JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AS TO NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE, AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES ONLY AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?