(PC) Hickman v. Chisholm et al
Filing
8
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/8/19 ADOPTING #5 Findings and Recommendations in full, DISMISSING this action as duplicative of Hickman v. Chisholm, No. 2:19-cv-1254 TLN AC. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KEVIN DUANE HICKMAN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:19-cv-1828 KJM AC P
v.
ORDER
MATT CHISHOLM, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
19
as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On September 17, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
20
21
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF. No. 7.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the
26
findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 17, 2019 (ECF No. 5), are adopted
3
4
in full; and
2. This action is dismissed as duplicative of Hickman v. Chisholm, No. 2:19-cv-1254
5
TLN AC.
6
DATED: October 8, 2019.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?