(PS) Expose v. Fay Servicing, Inc. et al

Filing 30

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/12/21 ADOPTING in full 29 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to serve Defendants. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LINDA ROSE EXPOSE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:19-cv-01866-TLN-KJN
ORDER

v.
FAY SERVICING, INC., et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this civil action in connection with a foreclosure. The

17
18

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On January 13, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No.

19
20

29), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

21

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were

22

filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United

23

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

24

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

25

1983).

26

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

27

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly,

28

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1

1

1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 29) are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2

2. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to serve

3
4
5

Defendants; and
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
DATED: February 12, 2021

6
7
8
9

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2