(PS) Ervin v. Jones et al
Filing
83
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/6/2022 SETTING and in-person Order to Show Cause Hearing for 1/18/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 before Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota.(Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GARY WAYNE ERVIN,
12
13
14
No. 2:19-CV-1883-KJM-CKD
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
JANET ABSHIRE,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. A settlement
17
18
conference was held before the undersigned on October 27, 2021, and December 1, 2021. See
19
ECF Nos. 78 and 80 (minutes). A settlement was reached at the December 1, 2021, conference
20
and the terms of the settlement were read into the record. See ECF No. 80. It has come to the
21
Court’s attention that issues have arisen with respect to Plaintiff’s compliance with the terms of
22
the settlement agreement and signing of dispositional documents. See ECF No. 81 (Defendant’s
23
status report).
24
Good cause appearing therefor, and on the Court’s own motion, the parties shall
25
appear in-in person before the undersigned on January 18, 2022, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No.
26
10 in Sacramento, California, where Plaintiff shall show cause why appropriate sanctions should
27
not be imposed for failure to execute necessary documents consistent with the parties’ prior
28
agreement to settle this matter. The hearing shall commence at 9:00 a.m. sharp and sanctions
1
1
may be imposed on either party for tardiness.
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the matter is set for an in-person
3
order to show cause hearing before the undersigned in Sacramento, California, on January 18,
4
2022, to commence at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 10.
5
6
7
Dated: January 6, 2022
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?