(PC) Hodge v. Rueter et al
Filing
127
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 05/09/2024 DIRECTING Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE within 21 days why this cause should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. (Spichka, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JASON ROBERT HODGE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
TAYLOR, et al.,
15
Case No. 2:19-cv-01956-DAD-JDP (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff has been provided with numerous extensions of time to file a response to
18
defendants’ motion for summary judgment, yet he has failed to do so. See ECF Nos. 120, 122,
19
123, & 126. Out of an abundance of caution and in light of plaintiff’s pro se status, plaintiff will
20
be afforded a final opportunity to file an opposition or statement of defendants’ motion for
21
summary judgment, which was filed six months ago. See ECF No. 114. Should plaintiff fail to
22
comply with this order, I expect to recommend that this action be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
23
41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689
24
(9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is
25
a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to administer justice expeditiously and avoid
26
needless burden for the parties. See Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002);
27
Fed. R. Civ. P. 1.
28
I will give plaintiff a chance to explain why the court should not dismiss the case for his
1
1
failure to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion. Plaintiff’s
2
failure to respond to this order will constitute a failure to comply with a court order and will result
3
in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show
4
cause within twenty-one days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and
5
failure to comply with court orders. Should plaintiff wish to continue with this lawsuit, he shall
6
file, within twenty-one days, an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated:
May 9, 2024
10
JEREMY D. PETERSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?