California Chamber of Commerce v. Becerra
Filing
250
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 11/9/2023 MODIFYING the Scheduling Order as follows: Disclosure of Expert Witnesses due by 12/15/2023; Rebuttal Expert Witnesses due by 1/19/2024; Fact Discovery due by 1/12/2024 ; All Expert Discovery due by 3/15/2024; All Motions due by 5/10/2024; Motion Hearing set for 9/19/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (DJC) before District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta; Motion for Summary Judgment due by 5/10/2024; Opposition to Motion and Cross-Motion to Summary Judgment due by 6/21/2024. (Clemente Licea, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Trenton H. Norris (CA Bar No. 164781)
trent.norris@hoganlovells.com
David M. Barnes (CA Bar No. 318547)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3500
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 374-2300
Facsimile: (415) 374-2499
Attorneys for California Chamber of Commerce
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, Case No. 2:19-cv-02019-DJC-JDP
11
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY
SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER
v.
Judge:
Action Filed:
SAC Filed:
Hearing:
ROB BONTA, IN HIS OFFICIAL
CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta
October 7, 2019
April 19, 2023
May 9, 2023
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-CV-02019-DJC-JDP
JOINT STIPULATION
1
WHEREAS, the Court finalized its Scheduling Order on September 7, 2023 (ECF No.
2
3
4
248);
WHEREAS, Plaintiff California Chamber of Commerce, Defendant Rob Bonta, in his
5
official capacity as Attorney General of California, and Defendant-Intervenor Council for
6
Education and Research on Toxics (collectively, the “Parties”) have made no prior requests for
7
extensions or modifications to the Scheduling Order;
8
WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant have trials in other cases in late April 2024 that
9
conflict with the motion briefing deadlines in the Scheduling Order, and the parties have agreed it
10
11
will be beneficial to extend the briefing schedule;
WHEREAS, due to the Court’s order granting the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF
12
No. 114) by Plaintiff, which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld on March 17,
13
2022, see Cal. Chamber of Commerce v. Council for Educ. & Rsch. on Toxics, 29 F.4th 468 (9th
14
Cir. 2022), the status quo ante is preserved, insofar as possible, during the pendency of the
15
proceedings in this action;
16
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred on modifications to the Scheduling Order
17
and have negotiated a briefing schedule for the anticipated summary judgment motion(s) that they
18
request the Court consider;
19
WHEREAS, the Court has not yet set a trial date or final pretrial conference date;
20
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the Parties, by and through their respective
21
attorneys of record, and subject to the approval of the Court, that the Scheduling Order shall be
22
modified as follows:
23
24
25
26
1. The deadline to disclose expert witnesses, previously set for November 17, 2023, be
moved to December 15, 2023;
2. The deadline to disclose expert witnesses for rebuttal purposes, previously set for
December 15, 2023, be moved to January 19, 2024;
27
3. The cutoff for fact discovery remain as January 12, 2024;
28
4. The cutoff for all expert discovery, previously set for January 12, 2024, be moved to
2
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-02019-DJC-JDP
March 15, 2024;
1
5. The deadline to file any motions (except motions for continuances, temporary
2
3
restraining orders, or other emergency applications), previously set for March 22,
4
2024, be moved to May 10, 2024;
6. The hearing on any such motions (except motions for continuances, temporary
5
6
restraining orders, or other emergency applications), previously set for May 9, 2024 at
7
1:30 PM, be moved to September 19, 2024 at 1:30 PM, or the next available date for
8
the Court;
7. Consistent with the foregoing, the Parties have agreed to the following briefing
9
10
schedule on the motion(s) for summary judgment:
11
a. Defendant will inform Plaintiff by April 26, 2024 whether he plans to file a crossmotion for summary judgment;
12
13
b. Plaintiff will file its Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) by May 10, 2024;
14
c. Defendant will file his opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion, as well as any crossmotion for summary judgment, by June 21, 2024;
15
d. Plaintiff will file its reply in support of its Motion, and its opposition to any cross-
16
motion, by July 26, 2024;
17
e. Defendant will file his reply in support of his cross-motion, if any, by August 16,
18
2024.
19
20
21
Dated:
November 9, 2023
Respectfully submitted,
By:
/s/ Trenton H. Norris
Trenton H. Norris
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, 35th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
Tel: (415) 374-2300
trent.norris@hoganlovells.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff California Chamber of
Commerce
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-02019-DJC-JDP
1
Dated:
November 9, 2023
Respectfully submitted,
2
ROB BONTA
Attorney General of California
LAURA J. ZUCKERMAN
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
3
4
5
By: /s/ Megan K. Hey
MEGAN HEY
RAFAEL HURTADO
Deputy Attorneys General
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
300 South Spring Street, Suite 1702
Los Angeles, CA 90013-1230
Telephone: (213) 269-6344
E-mail: Megan.Hey@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Rob Bonta, Attorney General of
the State of California
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Dated:
November 9, 2023
Respectfully submitted,
14
By: /s/ Raphael Metzger
Raphael Metzger, Esq.
Scott Brust, Esq.
METZGER LAW GROUP
A Professional Law Corporation
401 E. Ocean Blvd., Suite 800
Long Beach, CA 90802
Tel: (562) 437-4499
rmetzger@toxictorts.com
Attorneys for Intervenor-Defendant, Council for
Education and Research on Toxics
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-02019-DJC-JDP
1
2
3
4
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Based on the Joint Stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS
ORDERED that the Scheduling Order be modified as follows:
1.
5
6
be moved to December 15, 2023;
2.
7
8
9
3.
The cutoff for fact discovery remain as January 12, 2024;
4.
The cutoff for all expert discovery, previously set for January 12, 2024, be moved
to March 15, 2024;
5.
12
2024, be moved to May 10, 2024;
6.
15
18
19
The hearing on any such motions (except motions for continuances, temporary
restraining orders, or other emergency applications), previously set for May 9,
16
17
The deadline to file any motions (except motions for continuances, temporary
restraining orders, or other emergency applications), previously set for March 22,
13
14
The deadline to disclose expert witnesses for rebuttal purposes, previously set
for December 15, 2023, be moved to January 19, 2024;
10
11
The deadline to disclose expert witnesses, previously set for November 17, 2023,
2024 at 1:30 PM, be moved to September 19, 2024 at 1:30 PM;
7.
Consistent with the foregoing, the following briefing schedule shall apply to any
motion(s) for summary judgment:
a.
20
21
cross-motion for summary judgment;
b.
22
23
c.
28
Defendant will file his opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion, as well as any
cross-motion for summary judgment, by June 21, 2024;
d.
26
27
Plaintiff will file its Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) by May
10, 2024;
24
25
Defendant will inform Plaintiff by April 26, 2024 whether he plans to file a
Plaintiff will file its reply in support of its Motion, and its opposition to any
cross-motion, by July 26, 2024;
e.
Defendant will file his reply in support of his cross-motion, if any, by
5
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-CV-02019-DJC-JDP
1
2
August 16, 2024.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
Dated: November 9, 2023
/s/ Daniel J. Calabretta
THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-02019-DJC-JDP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?